Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
J Biomech. 2013 Sep 3;46(13):2201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.022. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
Research concerning forefoot strike pattern (FFS) versus rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) running has focused on the ground reaction force even though internal joint contact forces are a more direct measure of the loads responsible for injury. The main purpose of this study was to determine the internal loading of the joints for each strike pattern. A secondary purpose was to determine if converted FFS and RFS runners can adequately represent habitual runners with regards to the internal joint loading. Using inverse dynamics to calculate the net joint moments and reaction forces and optimization techniques to estimate muscle forces, we determined the axial compressive loading at the ankle, knee, and hip. Subjects consisted of 15 habitual FFS and 15 habitual RFS competitive runners. Each subject ran at a preferred running velocity with their habitual strike pattern and then converted to the opposite strike pattern. Plantar flexor muscle forces and net ankle joint moments were greater in the FFS running compared to the RFS running during the first half of the stance phase. The average contact forces during this period increased by 41.7% at the ankle and 14.4% at the knee joint during FFS running. Peak ankle joint contact force was 1.5 body weights greater during FFS running (p<0.05). There was no evidence to support a difference between habitual and converted running for joint contact forces. The increased loading at the ankle joint for FFS is an area of concern for individuals considering altering their foot strike pattern.
有关前足着地(FFS)和后足着地(RFS)跑步模式的研究重点是地面反作用力,尽管关节内部接触力是更直接的受伤负荷测量指标。本研究的主要目的是确定每个着地模式下关节的内部负荷。次要目的是确定转换后的 FFS 和 RFS 跑步者是否可以在关节内部负荷方面充分代表习惯性跑步者。我们使用逆动力学来计算净关节力矩和反作用力,并使用优化技术来估计肌肉力量,从而确定踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的轴向压缩负荷。研究对象包括 15 名习惯性 FFS 和 15 名习惯性 RFS 竞技跑步者。每位受试者都以其惯用的着地模式以其偏好的跑步速度进行跑步,然后转换为相反的着地模式。在支撑阶段的前半段,FFS 跑步时的跖屈肌肌肉力量和踝关节净力矩大于 RFS 跑步时。在此期间,踝关节的平均接触力增加了 41.7%,膝关节的平均接触力增加了 14.4%。FFS 跑步时,踝关节的峰值接触力比 RFS 跑步时高 1.5 倍体重(p<0.05)。没有证据支持习惯性跑步和转换跑步在关节接触力方面存在差异。FFS 时踝关节的负荷增加是考虑改变足着地模式的个体需要关注的问题。