Suppr超能文献

咬合设计对咀嚼能力及全口义齿患者满意度的影响:一项系统评价

Occlusal designs on masticatory ability and patient satisfaction with complete denture: a systematic review.

作者信息

Zhao Ke, Mai Qing-Qing, Wang Xiao-Dong, Yang Wen, Zhao Li

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Guanghua Hospital of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China.

出版信息

J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review clinical outcomes of different occlusal designs of complete dentures.

METHODS

Using a various key words, an electronic search of clinical trials published in English and Chinese literature was performed from four databases: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CBM. Furthermore, a manual searching of the relevant journals and the bibliographies of reviews was performed. General satisfaction, masticatory ability, retention, and stability were major criteria for the evaluation of the outcomes. Studies met these criteria were selected for a full-text reading. The whole processes were performed by two reviewers independently.

RESULTS

This systematic review started with 1030 articles, which were finally narrowed down to seven, according to the inclusion criteria. The following occlusal designs were included and analyzed: anatomic occlusion, balanced occlusion, canine guidance occlusion, lingualized occlusion, monoplane occlusion, and bilateral-balanced and canine-guided design. Three of the seven studies showed that lingualized occlusion had ratings of higher patients' satisfaction than other occlusion designs. On the other hand, the canine-guided occlusion dentures demonstrated equal or better clinical performances than bilateral-balanced dentures. Because of the heterogeneity and bias of the studies, it was not possible to analyze the data statistically.

CONCLUSIONS

Lingualized occlusion and canine-guided occlusion can be successfully applied in the fabrication of complete dentures. Canine guided occlusion has also been shown to be satisfactory. More well-controlled randomized trials are needed regarding canine-guided occlusion and the relationship between alveolar ridge resorption, different occlusal schemes and patient satisfaction. The conventional prosthodontic wisdom that complete dentures require a balanced occlusal design is not supported by the included literature.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

A suitable occlusal scheme would be a critical factor for a successful complete denture. However, there is no conclusive evidence to support which occlusal design is more appropriate for fabricating a successful complete denture. In occlusal design of conventional complete denture, lingualized occlusion can provide better clinical outcomes than other occlusal designs; meanwhile, canine-guided occlusion also can be used in clinic practice.

摘要

目的

系统评价全口义齿不同咬合设计的临床效果。

方法

使用多种关键词,从四个数据库(Medline/PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和中国生物医学文献数据库)对发表在英文和中文文献中的临床试验进行电子检索。此外,还对手相关期刊及综述的参考文献进行了手工检索。总体满意度、咀嚼能力、固位和稳定性是评估结果的主要标准。符合这些标准的研究被选出来进行全文阅读。整个过程由两名评审员独立完成。

结果

本系统评价最初检索到1030篇文章,根据纳入标准最终筛选出7篇。纳入并分析了以下咬合设计:解剖式咬合、平衡咬合、尖牙引导咬合、舌侧集中咬合、平面式咬合以及双侧平衡与尖牙引导设计。七项研究中的三项表明,舌侧集中咬合的患者满意度评分高于其他咬合设计。另一方面,尖牙引导咬合义齿的临床性能与双侧平衡义齿相当或更好。由于研究的异质性和偏倚,无法对数据进行统计学分析。

结论

舌侧集中咬合和尖牙引导咬合可成功应用于全口义齿的制作。尖牙引导咬合也已被证明是令人满意的。关于尖牙引导咬合以及牙槽嵴吸收与不同咬合方案和患者满意度之间的关系,需要更多严格对照的随机试验。纳入的文献不支持全口义齿需要平衡咬合设计这一传统口腔修复学观点。

临床意义

合适的咬合方案是全口义齿成功的关键因素。然而,尚无确凿证据支持哪种咬合设计更适合制作成功的全口义齿。在传统全口义齿的咬合设计中,舌侧集中咬合比其他咬合设计能提供更好的临床效果;同时,尖牙引导咬合也可应用于临床实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验