Suppr超能文献

全口义齿制作实验室阶段操作差异对患者满意度及义齿质量的影响。

Influence of procedural variations during the laboratory phase of complete denture fabrication on patient satisfaction and denture quality.

作者信息

Omar Ridwaan, Al-Tarakemah Yacoub, Akbar Jaber, Al-Awadhi Sundos, Behbehani Yousif, Lamontagne Pierre

机构信息

Discipline of Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

出版信息

J Dent. 2013 Oct;41(10):852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare subjective and objective outcomes of complete dentures fabricated with standard clinical protocols, but omitted selected steps during the laboratory phase.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three edentulous patients (mean age 58.1 years, SD 9.9, range 35-78), were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to one of four groups according to selected variations of laboratory steps: Group 1 (n=10), omission of secondary casts obtained from impressions in border moulded custom trays; Group 2 (n=10), omission of secondary casts and face-bow articulator mounting; Group 3 (n=10), omission of face-bow mounting; Group 4 (n=13), no steps omitted (control). Clinical procedures for all groups were identical, and performed by senior dental students under supervision of prosthodontists, all of whom were blinded to the Group. At 1-, 4- and 12-weeks after delivery, patients rated their overall satisfaction, as well as a range of functional factors using visual analogue scales. An independent blinded prosthodontist similarly rated four domains of denture quality at the 1-week follow-up.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted among the groups in all aspects of patients' assessments at all the time points (P>0.1). There were no significant differences in prosthodontists' ratings of denture quality in any of the domains examined (P>0.1).

CONCLUSION

Selected omissions of steps (face-bow mounting and/or secondary casts) during the laboratory phase of complete denture fabrication has only a minor role, if any, in subjective and objective outcomes, contrasting with the common belief that such omissions will adversely affect outcomes.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

General practitioners provide most complete dentures. Many do not follow all the procedures they were taught at dental school. Our finding that omitting frequently advocated steps made no difference to patient satisfaction or to denture quality suggests that cost-effectiveness through simplifications be considered in practice and in education.

摘要

目的

比较采用标准临床方案制作的全口义齿的主观和客观结果,但在实验室阶段省略选定步骤。

材料与方法

连续招募43名无牙颌患者(平均年龄58.1岁,标准差9.9,范围35 - 78岁),并根据实验室步骤的选定变化随机分为四组:第1组(n = 10),省略从边缘成型定制托盘印模获得的二次模型;第2组(n = 10),省略二次模型和面弓架安装;第3组(n = 10),省略面弓架安装;第4组(n = 13),无步骤省略(对照组)。所有组的临床程序相同,由高级牙科学生在口腔修复医生的监督下进行,所有人员均对分组情况不知情。在义齿交付后1周、4周和12周,患者使用视觉模拟量表对其总体满意度以及一系列功能因素进行评分。一名独立的不知情口腔修复医生在1周随访时同样对义齿质量的四个领域进行评分。

结果

在所有时间点,各组患者评估的所有方面均未观察到显著差异(P > 0.1)。在任何检查领域,口腔修复医生对义齿质量的评分均无显著差异(P > 0.1)。

结论

在全口义齿制作的实验室阶段选定步骤的省略(面弓架安装和/或二次模型),即使有影响,在主观和客观结果中也只起很小的作用,这与普遍认为此类省略会对结果产生不利影响的观点形成对比。

临床意义

全科医生提供了大多数全口义齿。许多人并未遵循他们在牙科学校所学的所有程序。我们的研究发现,省略经常提倡的步骤对患者满意度或义齿质量没有影响,这表明在实践和教育中应考虑通过简化实现成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验