• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放修复的结果比较。

Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Chicago School of Medicine and Biological Sciences, and Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.063. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.063
PMID:23911637
Abstract

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery has evolved from simple extirpative surgery to complex reconstructions even in infants. Data are lacking comparing surgical and direct costs to open approaches. We describe the feasibility, salient tips and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to an open approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients undergoing open pyeloplasty or robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ten patients in each group met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 3.31 months in the open group and 7.3 months in the robotic group (p=0.02). Postoperative outcomes including length of stay (2.2 vs 2.1 days), estimated blood loss (6.5 vs 7.6 ml), days to regular diet (1 vs 1.1) and days to Foley catheter removal (1.3 vs 1.3) were similar between the open and robotic groups. Total operating time (199 vs 242 minutes) was significantly longer in the robotic group. Postoperative improvement in hydronephrosis was identical in both groups. Direct costs, excluding amortization, robotic cost, maintenance and depreciation, were $4,410 in the open group and $4,979 in the robotic group (p=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

In our preliminary experience robotic pyeloplasty in infants is feasible and safe. The immediate outcomes are similar to those of an open approach. The robotic technique in infants currently has the benefits of improved esthetic appearance, improved pain control and similar direct costs compared to the traditional open approach.

摘要

目的

机器人手术已经从简单的切除术发展到即使在婴儿中也能进行复杂的重建术。缺乏比较开放手术的手术和直接成本的数据。我们描述了机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放手术相比的可行性、显著技巧和结果。

材料和方法

我们评估了接受开放肾盂成形术或机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术的患者。每组各有 10 名符合纳入标准的患者。

结果

开放组患者的平均年龄为 3.31 个月,机器人组为 7.3 个月(p=0.02)。术后结果包括住院时间(2.2 天 vs 2.1 天)、估计失血量(6.5 毫升 vs 7.6 毫升)、恢复正常饮食的天数(1 天 vs 1.1 天)和拔除 Foley 导管的天数(1.3 天 vs 1.3 天)在开放组和机器人组之间相似。机器人组的总手术时间(199 分钟 vs 242 分钟)明显更长。两组术后肾积水改善情况相同。不包括摊销、机器人成本、维护和折旧的直接成本,开放组为 4410 美元,机器人组为 4979 美元(p=0.10)。

结论

在我们的初步经验中,婴儿机器人肾盂成形术是可行和安全的。即时结果与开放手术相似。与传统的开放手术相比,目前机器人技术在婴儿中具有改善美观、改善疼痛控制和相似直接成本的优点。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.婴儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放修复的结果比较。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.063. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:钬激光与气压弹道碎石清石效果的比较
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
3
Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.儿童机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放性肾盂成形术的初步比较。
Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.021. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
4
Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.小儿标准腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术:单中心比较研究。
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
5
Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?儿童肾盂成形术失败:机器人辅助腹腔镜再次修复是否可行?
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):69.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.使用 5 毫米器械是否会影响较小工作空间下机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术的结果?婴儿和大龄儿童的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):537.e1-537.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
7
Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.机器人辅助肾盂成形术与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):813-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.813.
8
Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.婴儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术:单中心的结果,以及安全性和成功的技巧。
Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):621-631. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.机器人辅助腹腔镜再次手术修复儿童失败的肾盂成形术:一种安全且高效的治疗选择。
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.118. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
10
Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.开放与机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术后父母满意度:改良格拉斯哥儿童受益量表调查结果。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 20;11:e16468. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16468. eCollection 2023.
2
The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 6;39(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05541-8.
3
Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.
机器人辅助肾盂成形术在儿童中的应用:文献系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
4
Comparison of perioperative surgical outcomes following total robotic and total laparoscopic Roux-en Y hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in paediatric population: a preliminary report from a tertiary referral centre.小儿胆总管囊肿行全机器人与全腹腔镜 Roux-en Y 胆肠吻合术的围手术期手术结局比较:来自三级转诊中心的初步报告。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Feb 26;39(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05414-0.
5
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:开放手术还是微创手术?一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 23;10:1052440. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1052440. eCollection 2022.
6
Robotic Anxiety-Parents' Perception of Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery.机器人焦虑——父母对机器人辅助小儿外科手术的认知
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;9(3):399. doi: 10.3390/children9030399.
7
Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.腹腔镜和机器人肾盂成形术作为微创替代开放手术治疗婴儿输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻:多机构结局和学习曲线比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03929-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Commentary: Early Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Infants Under 3 Months With Severe Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.评论:3个月以下患有严重肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的婴儿的早期机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 10;9:724219. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.724219. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less.12个月及以下婴儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 14;9:647139. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.647139. eCollection 2021.
10
Early Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Infants Under 3 Months With Severe Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.3个月以下重度肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻婴儿的早期机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术
Front Pediatr. 2021 Mar 10;9:590865. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.590865. eCollection 2021.