Musculoskeletal Health and Movement Science Laboratory, University of Toledo, OH.
J Athl Train. 2013 Sep-Oct;48(5):696-709. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.11. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
Clinicians perform therapeutic interventions, such as stretching, manual therapy, electrotherapy, ultrasound, and exercises, to increase ankle dorsiflexion. However, authors of previous studies have not determined which intervention or combination of interventions is most effective.
To determine the magnitude of therapeutic intervention effects on and the most effective therapeutic interventions for restoring normal ankle dorsiflexion after ankle sprain.
We performed a comprehensive literature search in Web of Science and EBSCO HOST from 1965 to May 29, 2011, with 19 search terms related to ankle sprain, dorsiflexion, and intervention and by cross-referencing pertinent articles.
Eligible studies had to be written in English and include the means and standard deviations of both pretreatment and posttreatment in patients with acute, subacute, or chronic ankle sprains. Outcomes of interest included various joint mobilizations, stretching, local vibration, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, electrical stimulation, and mental-relaxation interventions.
We extracted data on dorsiflexion improvements among various therapeutic applications by calculating Cohen d effect sizes with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and evaluated the methodologic quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.
In total, 9 studies (PEDro score = 5.22 ± 1.92) met the inclusion criteria. Static-stretching interventions with a home exercise program had the strongest effects on increasing dorsiflexion in patients 2 weeks after acute ankle sprains (Cohen d = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.12, 2.42). The range of effect sizes for movement with mobilization on ankle dorsiflexion among individuals with recurrent ankle sprains was small (Cohen d range = 0.14 to 0.39).
Static-stretching intervention as a part of standardized care yielded the strongest effects on dorsiflexion after acute ankle sprains. The existing evidence suggests that clinicians need to consider what may be the limiting factor of ankle dorsiflexion to select the most appropriate treatments and interventions. Investigators should examine the relationship between improvements in dorsiflexion and patient progress using measures of patient self-reported functional outcome after therapeutic interventions to determine the most appropriate forms of therapeutic interventions to address ankle-dorsiflexion limitation.
临床医生通过伸展、手法治疗、电疗、超声波和运动等治疗干预措施来增加踝关节背屈。然而,之前的研究作者并没有确定哪种干预措施或干预措施组合最有效。
确定治疗干预对恢复踝关节扭伤后正常踝关节背屈的效果大小,以及最有效的治疗干预措施。
我们在 1965 年至 2011 年 5 月 29 日期间,在 Web of Science 和 EBSCO HOST 上进行了全面的文献检索,使用了 19 个与踝关节扭伤、背屈和干预相关的搜索词,并通过交叉参考相关文章进行了检索。
符合条件的研究必须用英文撰写,并包括急性、亚急性或慢性踝关节扭伤患者的治疗前和治疗后的平均值和标准差。感兴趣的结果包括各种关节松动术、伸展、局部振动、高压氧治疗、电刺激和心理放松干预。
我们通过计算科恩 d 效应大小并与相关 95%置信区间(CI)一起提取各种治疗应用中背屈改善的数据,并使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估方法学质量。
共有 9 项研究(PEDro 评分=5.22±1.92)符合纳入标准。急性踝关节扭伤后 2 周,静态伸展干预联合家庭运动计划对增加背屈的效果最强(科恩 d=1.06;95%CI=0.12,2.42)。在有复发性踝关节扭伤的个体中,关节活动度对踝关节背屈的影响效应大小范围较小(科恩 d 范围=0.14 至 0.39)。
作为标准化治疗的一部分,静态伸展干预对急性踝关节扭伤后背屈的影响最强。现有证据表明,临床医生需要考虑限制踝关节背屈的因素,以选择最合适的治疗和干预措施。研究人员应通过测量治疗干预后患者自我报告的功能结果,检查背屈改善与患者进展之间的关系,以确定解决踝关节背屈限制的最合适形式的治疗干预措施。