• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和初级保健提供者使用家庭健康史收集、风险分层和临床决策支持工具的体验:一种 2 型混合对照实施效果试验。

Patient and primary care provider experience using a family health history collection, risk stratification, and clinical decision support tool: a type 2 hybrid controlled implementation-effectiveness trial.

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development, VA Health System, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 6;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-111.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-14-111
PMID:23915256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3765729/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family health history (FHH) is the single strongest predictor of disease risk and yet is significantly underutilized in primary care. We developed a patient facing FHH collection tool, MeTree, that uses risk stratification to generate clinical decision support for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, hereditary cancer syndromes, and thrombosis. Here we present data on the experience of patients and providers after integration of MeTree into 2 primary care practices.

METHODS

This was a Type 2 hybrid controlled implementation-effectiveness study in 3 community-based primary care clinics in Greensboro, NC. All non-adopted adult English speaking patients with upcoming routine appointments were invited. Patients were recruited from December 2009 to the present and followed for one year. Ease of integration of MeTree into clinical practice at the two intervention clinics was evaluated through patient surveys after their appointment and at 3 months post-visit, and physician surveys 3 months after tool integration.

RESULTS

Total enrollment =1,184. Average time to complete MeTree = 27 minutes. Patients found MeTree: easy to use (93%), easy to understand (97%), useful (98%), raised awareness of disease risk (85%), and changed how they think about their health (86%). Of the 26% (N = 311) asking for assistance to complete the tool, age (65 sd 9.4 vs. 57 sd 11.8, p-value < 0.00) and large pedigree size (24.4 sd 9.81 vs. 22.2 sd 8.30, p-value < 0.00) were the only significant factors; 77% of those requiring assistance were over the age of 60. Providers (N = 14) found MeTree: improved their practice (86%), improved their understanding of FHH (64%), made practice easier (79%), and worthy of recommending to their peers (93%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that MeTree has broad acceptance and support from both patients and providers and can be implemented without disruption to workflow.

摘要

背景

家族健康史(FHH)是疾病风险的最强预测因素,但在初级保健中却未得到充分利用。我们开发了一种面向患者的 FHH 收集工具,MeTree,它使用风险分层为乳腺癌、结直肠癌、卵巢癌、遗传性癌症综合征和血栓形成提供临床决策支持。这里我们介绍了将 MeTree 整合到 2 个初级保健实践中的患者和提供者的经验数据。

方法

这是北卡罗来纳州格林斯伯勒的 3 个社区初级保健诊所的 2 型混合控制实施效果研究。所有即将进行常规预约的非采用成年英语患者均被邀请参加。从 2009 年 12 月开始招募患者,并随访一年。通过患者在预约后的随访和就诊后 3 个月以及医生在工具整合后 3 个月进行的调查,评估 MeTree 在两个干预诊所的临床实践中的整合难易程度。

结果

总入组人数=1184。完成 MeTree 的平均时间为 27 分钟。患者发现 MeTree:易于使用(93%)、易于理解(97%)、有用(98%)、提高了对疾病风险的认识(85%)、并改变了他们对健康的看法(86%)。在要求协助完成工具的 26%(N=311)的患者中,年龄(65 岁标准差 9.4 岁与 57 岁标准差 11.8 岁,p 值<0.00)和大系谱大小(24.4 岁标准差 9.81 岁与 22.2 岁标准差 8.30 岁,p 值<0.00)是唯一的显著因素;需要协助的患者中 77%的年龄超过 60 岁。提供者(N=14)发现 MeTree:改善了他们的实践(86%)、改善了他们对 FHH 的理解(64%)、使实践更容易(79%)、并值得向他们的同行推荐(93%)。

结论

我们的研究表明,MeTree 得到了患者和提供者的广泛认可和支持,并且可以在不中断工作流程的情况下实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b3/3765729/50291d0a9732/1471-2296-14-111-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b3/3765729/50291d0a9732/1471-2296-14-111-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47b3/3765729/50291d0a9732/1471-2296-14-111-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and primary care provider experience using a family health history collection, risk stratification, and clinical decision support tool: a type 2 hybrid controlled implementation-effectiveness trial.患者和初级保健提供者使用家庭健康史收集、风险分层和临床决策支持工具的体验:一种 2 型混合对照实施效果试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 6;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-111.
2
Quality of family history collection with use of a patient facing family history assessment tool.使用面向患者的家族史评估工具收集家族史的质量
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Feb 13;15:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-31.
3
Implementing family health history risk stratification in primary care: impact of guideline criteria on populations and resource demand.在初级保健中实施家族健康史风险分层:指南标准对人群和资源需求的影响。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):24-33. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31388. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
4
An electronic family health history tool to identify and manage patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种用于识别和管理结直肠癌风险增加患者的电子家庭健康史工具:一项随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 7;20(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3659-y.
5
Hereditary Cancer Risk Using a Genetic Chatbot Before Routine Care Visits.遗传癌症风险:在常规就诊前使用遗传聊天机器人。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 1;138(6):860-870. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004596.
6
Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.在初级保健中使用带有决策支持的患者录入式家族健康史工具:识别风险增加患者对遗传咨询就诊率的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):179-88. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9753-0. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
7
Development and validation of a primary care-based family health history and decision support program (MeTree).基于初级保健的家庭健康史与决策支持项目(MeTree)的开发与验证
N C Med J. 2013 Jul-Aug;74(4):287-96.
8
Clinical utility of a Web-enabled risk-assessment and clinical decision support program.基于网络的风险评估与临床决策支持程序的临床效用
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):1020-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.210. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
9
Protocol for implementation of family health history collection and decision support into primary care using a computerized family health history system.使用计算机化家庭健康史系统在初级保健中实施家庭健康史收集和决策支持的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 11;11:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-264.
10
Protocol for the "Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings" study.“在不同护理环境中实施、采用和应用家族史”研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 24;10:163. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0352-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Approach to Screen, Identify, and Correct Malfunctioning Interruptive Alerts.一种用于筛查、识别和纠正故障中断警报的系统方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Aug;16(4):863-871. doi: 10.1055/a-2646-6297. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Mapping intellectual structure and research hotspots of cancer studies in primary health care: A machine-learning-based analysis.绘制初级卫生保健中癌症研究的知识结构和研究热点:基于机器学习的分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 21;104(12):e41749. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041749.
3
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a primary care-based family health history and decision support program (MeTree).基于初级保健的家庭健康史与决策支持项目(MeTree)的开发与验证
N C Med J. 2013 Jul-Aug;74(4):287-96.
2
Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.有效性-实施混合设计:结合临床有效性和实施研究的元素,以提高公共卫生的影响力。
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
3
Protocol for implementation of family health history collection and decision support into primary care using a computerized family health history system.
医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.
4
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.电子健康使用对大流行前普通实践工作量的影响:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
5
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
6
Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review.遗传指导下的精准医学临床决策支持工具:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Apr 19;31(5):1183-1194. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae033.
7
Exploring key components and factors that influence the use of clinical decision- support tools for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease: the perspective of healthcare providers.探索影响为患有肾脏疾病的老年患者开处方使用临床决策支持工具的关键组成部分和因素:医疗保健提供者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10568-1.
8
Web-based tool for cancer family history collection: A prospective randomized controlled trial.基于网络的癌症家族史采集工具:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jun;173:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
9
Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review.工作负荷和工作流程对一般实践中医疗专业人员使用电子临床决策支持工具的影响:范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2.
10
Implementation-effectiveness trial of systematic family health history based risk assessment and impact on clinical disease prevention and surveillance activities.基于系统家庭健康史的风险评估的实施效果试验及其对临床疾病预防和监测活动的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):1486. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08879-2.
使用计算机化家庭健康史系统在初级保健中实施家庭健康史收集和决策支持的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 11;11:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-264.
4
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2011 年》
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011.
5
2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2010年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会无症状成年人心血管风险评估指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):2748-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182051bab. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
6
Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.第1部分:执行摘要:2010年心肺复苏与心血管急救科学及治疗建议国际共识。
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S250-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970897.
7
Health Heritage© a web-based tool for the collection and assessment of family health history: initial user experience and analytic validity.健康传承©:一款用于收集和评估家族健康史的网络工具——初步用户体验与分析效度
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(7-8):477-91. doi: 10.1159/000294415. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
8
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Family History and Improving Health.美国国立卫生研究院科学会议声明:家族史与增进健康
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):872-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00165.
9
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Family History and Improving Health: August 24-26, 2009.美国国立卫生研究院科学现状会议声明:家族病史与改善健康:2009年8月24日至26日
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2009 Aug 26;26(1):1-19.
10
The current state of cancer family history collection tools in primary care: a systematic review.初级保健中癌症家族史收集工具的现状:一项系统综述。
Genet Med. 2009 Jul;11(7):495-506. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a7e8e0.