• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盲肠插入时间与结直肠肿瘤检出的关系。

The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 6;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-124.

DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-13-124
PMID:23915303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3750659/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on the impact of cecal insertion time on colorectal neoplasm detection is limited. Our objective was to determine the association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection rate in colonoscopy screening.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of 12,679 consecutive subjects aged 40-79 years undergoing screening colonoscopy in routine health check-ups at the Center for Health Promotion of the Samsung Medical Center from December 2007 to June 2009. Fixed effects logistic regression conditioning on colonoscopist was used to eliminate confounding due to differences in technical ability and other characteristics across colonoscopists.

RESULTS

The mean cecal insertion time was 5.9 (SD, 4.4 minutes). We identified 4,249 (33.5%) participants with colorectal neoplasms, of whom 1,956 had small single adenomas (<5 mm), 595 had medium single adenomas (5-9 mm), and 1,699 had multiple adenomas or advanced colorectal neoplasms. The overall rates of colorectal neoplasm detection by quartiles of cecal insertion time were 36.8%, 33.4%, 32.7%, and 31.0%, respectively (p trend <0.001).The odds for small single colorectal adenoma detection was 16% lower (adjusted OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99) in the fourth compared to the first quartile of insertion time (p trend 0.005). Insertion time was not associated with the detection rate of single adenomas ≥5 mm, multiple adenomas or advanced colorectal neoplasms.

CONCLUSION

Shorter insertion times were associated with increased rates of detection of small colorectal adenomas <5 mm. Cecal insertion time may be clinically relevant as missed small colorectal adenomas may progress to more advanced lesions.

摘要

背景

关于盲肠插入时间对结直肠肿瘤检出率影响的信息有限。我们的目的是确定结肠镜筛查中盲肠插入时间与结直肠肿瘤检出率之间的关系。

方法

我们对 2007 年 12 月至 2009 年 6 月在三星医疗中心健康促进中心进行常规健康检查的 12679 名 40-79 岁连续受试者进行了一项横断面研究。使用固定效应逻辑回归条件分析(conditioning on)对结肠镜医师进行校正,以消除结肠镜医师之间因技术能力和其他特征差异而导致的混杂。

结果

盲肠插入时间的平均值为 5.9(SD,4.4 分钟)。我们发现 4249 名(33.5%)参与者患有结直肠肿瘤,其中 1956 名患有小单发腺瘤(<5mm),595 名患有单发中腺瘤(5-9mm),1699 名患有多发腺瘤或进展期结直肠肿瘤。按盲肠插入时间四分位数的结直肠肿瘤检出率分别为 36.8%、33.4%、32.7%和 31.0%(趋势 p<0.001)。与第一四分位数相比,第四四分位数的小单发结直肠腺瘤检出率降低 16%(调整 OR 0.84;95%CI 0.71 至 0.99)(趋势 p<0.005)。插入时间与单发腺瘤≥5mm、多发腺瘤或进展期结直肠肿瘤的检出率无关。

结论

较短的插入时间与<5mm 的小结直肠腺瘤的检出率增加有关。盲肠插入时间可能具有临床相关性,因为错过的小结直肠腺瘤可能进展为更高级别的病变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d4/3750659/71f196f1fb9a/1471-230X-13-124-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d4/3750659/71f196f1fb9a/1471-230X-13-124-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d4/3750659/71f196f1fb9a/1471-230X-13-124-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection.盲肠插入时间与结直肠肿瘤检出的关系。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 6;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-124.
2
Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.盲肠插入时间延长与腺瘤检出率降低有关。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):574-580. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
3
Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved.当达到更长的退出时间时,盲肠插入时间延长与腺瘤检出率降低无关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3120-3125. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5100-x. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
The association of serum lipids with colorectal adenomas.血清脂质与结直肠腺瘤的关系。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):833-41. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.64. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
5
Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program.在一项全国性结直肠癌筛查项目中与腺瘤检出相关的结肠镜检查因素。
Endoscopy. 2014 Mar;46(3):203-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358831. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
6
Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.高级腺瘤检出率与非高级腺瘤检出率无关。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1286-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.149. Epub 2013 May 28.
7
Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with gastric adenomas.我们是否需要对胃腺瘤患者进行结肠镜检查?胃腺瘤患者的结直肠腺瘤风险。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.042.
8
Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.经总体腺瘤检出率校正后,与盲肠插管相比,回肠插管与右侧传统腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的检出率升高无关。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1111-0.
9
Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.季度报告卡对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.德国筛查结肠镜计划实施前 10 年中腺瘤检出率的变化趋势。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):356-66.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Longer Cecal Intubation Time and Detection and Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasms.较长的盲肠插管时间与结直肠肿瘤的检出率及漏诊率之间的关联。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 23;13(23):7080. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237080.
2
The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence.内镜医师操作水平和患者因素对远端腺瘤检出率和结直肠癌发病率的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03125-x.
3
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of the insertion time and number of polyps on miss rate in colonoscopy.息肉插入时间及数量对结肠镜检查漏诊率的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;46(5):634-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.558111. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
2
Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.使用链式方程进行多重插补:实践中的问题和指导。
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
3
Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.
提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
Robotic endoscope with double-balloon and double-bend tube for colonoscopy.结肠镜用双球囊和双弯管的机器人内窥镜。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 28;13(1):10494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37566-3.
5
Negative effect of prolonged cecal intubation time on adenoma detection in female patients.盲肠插管时间延长对女性患者腺瘤检测的负面影响。
JGH Open. 2023 Jan 24;7(2):128-134. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12861. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.运用黑暗逻辑模型探索审计与反馈中的不良效应:结肠镜检查中博弈行为的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct;31(10):704-715. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013588. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
7
Evaluation of a novel colonoscope offering flexibility adjuster - a retrospective observational study.一种新型带灵活性调节器的结肠镜的评估——一项回顾性观察研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 May 30;14:17562848211013494. doi: 10.1177/17562848211013494. eCollection 2021.
8
Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time.影响肠道准备充分性及操作时间的因素。
JGH Open. 2019 Aug 20;4(2):206-214. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12241. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Cecal Insertion Time and the ADR: Patience Is Good for Patients.盲肠插入时间与不良事件率:耐心对患者有益。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):2823-2825. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5166-5.
10
Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved.当达到更长的退出时间时,盲肠插入时间延长与腺瘤检出率降低无关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3120-3125. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5100-x. Epub 2018 May 3.
初级保健医生在专科医生支持下进行的结肠镜筛查的质量和安全性。
Med Care. 2010 Aug;48(8):703-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e358a3.
4
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.结肠镜检查的质量指标与间隔期癌症风险。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
5
Debate: small (6-9 mm) and diminutive (1-5 mm) polyps noted on CTC: how should they be managed?辩论:CT结肠成像(CTC)检查发现的小(6 - 9毫米)及微小(1 - 5毫米)息肉:应如何处理?
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Apr;20(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.012.
6
Debate: diminutive polyps noted at CT colonography need not be reported.辩论:CT结肠成像检查中发现的微小息肉无需报告。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Apr;20(2):227-37. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.002.
7
Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit.在学术型胃肠病学单位中,结肠镜技术和腺瘤检出率的变化。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jan;55(1):166-71. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0703-2. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.腺瘤检出率:结肠镜检查质量的真实指标。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1217-20. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9315-3. Epub 2008 May 24.
9
Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?在结肠镜检查期间,我们是否需要将腺瘤检出率作为主要的质量控制参数?
Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):523-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995786. Epub 2008 May 8.
10
Adenoma detection rate and the quality of colonoscopy: the sword has two edges.腺瘤检出率与结肠镜检查质量:双刃剑。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):520-3. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9239-y. Epub 2008 Mar 6.