Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
This paper contributes to the international literature examining design of inpatient settings for mental health care. Theoretically, it elaborates the connections between conceptual frameworks from different strands of literature relating to therapeutic landscapes, social control and the social construction of risk. It does so through a discussion of the substantive example of research to evaluate the design of a purpose built inpatient psychiatric health care facility, opened in 2010 as part of the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Findings are reported from interviews or discussion groups with staff, patients and their family and friends. This paper demonstrates a strong, and often critical awareness among members of staff and other participants about how responsibilities for risk governance of 'persons' are exercised through 'technical safety' measures and the implications for therapeutic settings. Our participants often emphasised how responsibility for technical safety was being invested in the physical infrastructure of certain 'places' within the hospital where risks are seen to be 'located'. This illuminates how the spatial dimensions of social constructions of risk are incorporated into understandings about therapeutic landscapes. There were also more subtle implications, partly relating to 'Panopticist' theories about how the institution uses technical safety to supervise its own mechanisms, through the observation of staff behaviour as well as patients and visitors. Furthermore, staff seemed to feel that in relying on technical safety measures they were, to a degree, divesting themselves of human responsibility for risks they are required to manage. However, their critical assessment showed their concerns about how this might conflict with a more therapeutic approach and they contemplated ways that they might be able to engage more effectively with patients without the imposition of technical safety measures. These findings advance our thinking about the construction of therapeutic landscapes in theory and in practice.
本文为国际精神健康护理住院环境设计研究做出了贡献。从理论上阐述了治疗景观、社会控制和风险的社会建构等不同文献理论框架之间的联系。通过讨论评估 2010 年作为英格兰国民保健服务(NHS)一部分而新建的精神病住院医疗设施的设计的实质性研究实例,做到了这一点。研究结果来自于对工作人员、患者及其家人和朋友的访谈或小组讨论。本文展示了工作人员和其他参与者对如何通过“技术安全”措施行使对“人员”风险治理责任的强烈认识,以及这对治疗环境的影响。我们的参与者经常强调如何将技术安全责任投资于医院内某些“场所”的物理基础设施,因为这些场所被认为存在风险。这阐明了社会风险建构的空间维度如何融入治疗景观的理解中。还有一些更微妙的影响,部分涉及“全景监督”理论,即机构如何通过观察工作人员的行为以及患者和访客,利用技术安全来监督自身机制。此外,工作人员似乎认为,依靠技术安全措施,他们在一定程度上放弃了对自身必须管理的风险的人为责任。然而,他们的批判性评估表明了他们对这可能与更具治疗性方法冲突的担忧,并思考了他们在不实施技术安全措施的情况下如何能够更有效地与患者接触的方法。这些发现推进了我们对治疗景观的理论和实践建构的思考。