Suppr超能文献

自粘型粘结剂RelyX™ Unicem®(3M公司)与亲水性粘结剂MIP®(3M公司)和传统疏水性粘结剂Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity®(3M公司)组合之间牙釉质粘结的对比研究

Comparative study of enamel adhesion between RelyX™ Unicem® (3M), a self-adhesive bonding agent, and the combination of MIP® (3M), a hydrophilic adhesive, and Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity® (3M), a traditional hydrophobic adhesive.

作者信息

Dubernard Charles, Raynal Perrine, Tramini Paul

出版信息

Int Orthod. 2013 Sep;11(3):247-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Although the bond strength of self-adhesive bonding agents is inferior to that of other families of adhesives, it is still adequate for orthodontic purposes provided prior enamel etching is performed.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M) self-adhesive cement both in vitro and in vivo and to compare it with the combination of MIP(®) (3M), a moisture-insensitive primer, with a traditional hydrophobic adhesive, Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®) (3M).

IN VITRO

Comparison of bonding results on 23 trial dentures using RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M) with bonding results on 29 trial dentures using a combination of MIP(®) and Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®) (3M), by means of a multipurpose Instron(®) 4444 testing machine.

RESULTS

the breaking force of MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®) (3M) (mean: 144±37.5 Newtons) was significantly higher than that of RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M) (mean=110±26 Newtons) (P=0.001).

IN VIVO

A 12-month prospective, randomized, monocentric, single-blind clinical study in order to investigate the failure rate of orthodontic attachments according to the type of adhesive used, and the precise site of the debonding. Bracket bonding was performed on 16 patients with randomized allocation of the two adhesives to each of the semi-arches.

RESULTS

The failure rates were: 15.3% for the MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®) (3M) combination and 8.2% for the RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M), with a significant difference (P=0.039). The more posterior the bonded teeth, the greater the superiority of RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M). The in vivo results did not concord with those obtained in vitro. RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M) exhibited lower adhesion values in vitro and yet it presented a debonding rate almost half that of the MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®) (3M). The viscosity of RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M) and its moisture tolerance would appear to account for these results.

CONCLUSION

With prior etching, RelyX™ Unicem(®) (3M), a self-adhesive, self-etching bonding agent is compatible with use in the orthodontic indirect bonding technique. The MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®) (3M) combination, though very effective, still remains sensitive and requires special care during usage.

摘要

未标注

尽管自粘型粘结剂的粘结强度低于其他类型的粘结剂,但如果事先进行牙釉质酸蚀处理,其仍足以满足正畸用途。

目的

确定3M公司的RelyX™ Unicem(®)自粘型粘结剂在体外和体内的有效性,并将其与3M公司的MIP(®)(一种对湿度不敏感的底漆)与传统疏水粘结剂Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®)(3M)的组合进行比较。

体外实验

使用3M公司的RelyX™ Unicem(®)对23副试验义齿进行粘结,使用3M公司的MIP(®)和Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®)的组合对29副试验义齿进行粘结,通过一台万能Instron(®) 4444测试机比较粘结结果。

结果

MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®)(3M)的断裂力(平均值:144±37.5牛顿)显著高于RelyX™ Unicem(®)(3M)(平均值=110±26牛顿)(P=0.001)。

体内实验

一项为期12个月的前瞻性、随机、单中心、单盲临床研究,旨在根据所使用的粘结剂类型调查正畸附件的失败率以及脱粘的确切部位。对16名患者进行托槽粘结,将两种粘结剂随机分配到每个半牙弓。

结果

失败率分别为:MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®)(3M)组合为15.3%,RelyX™ Unicem(®)(3M)为8.2%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.039)。粘结的牙齿越靠后,RelyX™ Unicem(®)(3M)的优势就越大。体内实验结果与体外实验结果不一致。RelyX™ Unicem(®)(3M)在体外表现出较低的粘结值,但它的脱粘率几乎是MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®)(3M)的一半。RelyX™ Unicem(®)(3M)的粘度及其耐湿性似乎可以解释这些结果。

结论

经过事先酸蚀处理后,3M公司的自粘、自酸蚀粘结剂RelyX™ Unicem(®)可用于正畸间接粘结技术。MIP(®)/Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity(®)(3M)组合虽然非常有效,但仍然很敏感,使用时需要特别小心。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验