Penning C, van Amerongen J P
Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Aug;64(2):131-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90166-a.
Favorable results of composite resin sealant restorations in narrow occlusal cavities raise the question of whether extended cavity preparation is justified. Larger restorations are subject to increased polymerization shrinkage. Microleakage of extended and nonextended composite resin sealant restorations was tested in this study. Forty extracted caries-free third molars were allocated to four experimental groups. Occlusal cavity preparations were prepared, varying from narrow cavities restricted to the central fossa to preparations eradicating all fissures. Composite resin restorations were inserted with or without a base and with or without a sealant. Control restorations were inserted in nonetched preparations. Microleakage occurred when cavities were not etched and occassionally when a sealant was not applied. Conclusions indicate that a class I composite resin restoration extended beyond the central fossa can be free of microleakage if covered with a fissure sealant.
复合树脂封闭剂修复狭窄咬合面龋洞的良好效果引发了一个问题,即扩大洞形预备是否合理。较大的修复体聚合收缩增加。本研究测试了扩大和未扩大的复合树脂封闭剂修复体的微渗漏情况。将40颗拔除的无龋第三磨牙分配到四个实验组。制备咬合面龋洞,从局限于中央窝的狭窄龋洞到消除所有裂隙的洞形不等。复合树脂修复体在有或无基底、有或无封闭剂的情况下进行充填。对照修复体在未酸蚀的洞形中进行充填。当龋洞未酸蚀时以及偶尔未应用封闭剂时会发生微渗漏。结论表明,如果用裂隙封闭剂覆盖,超出中央窝的I类复合树脂修复体可以无微渗漏。