• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性肝衰竭和肝再生大鼠基因表达谱的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles of acute hepatic failure and that of liver regeneration in rat.

机构信息

College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

Gene. 2013 Oct 10;528(2):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.023
PMID:23916745
Abstract

To explore the relevance of rat liver regeneration (LR) to acute hepatic failure (AHF), Rat Genome 230 2.0 Array was used to detect their gene expression profiles in this study, and the reliability of the detection results was confirmed by real-time-PCR. 1012 genes were found to be significantly changed in AHF occurrence and 948 genes in LR. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed that physiological activities of AHF and those of LR had no time correlation. Hierarchical clustering analysis (which is performed to group genes based on the similarity of expression patterns) showed that physiological activities of AHF and those of LR had no time correlation. K-means clustering analysis (which is used to check the difference in the relevant predictor variables between different groups is significant or not) demonstrated that gene expression trend of C1 group (genes relate to categories of stimulus-response and cell apoptosis, etc.) in AHF and in LR was extremely similar, that those of their C2 group (categories of regulation of homeostasis and hormone stimulation, etc.) were contrary, and that those of their C3 (material and energy metabolism and oxidation reduction, etc.), C4 (Cell cycle-related genes) and C5 (cell proliferation-related genes) groups were also similar with the gene expression changes of LR more abundant. GO classifications and functional clustering analysis (which was used to statistics the numbers or composition of proteins or genes at a function level) revealed that cellular processes including immune response, inflammatory reaction, cell migration and adhesion, etc. were increased both in AHF and in LR, whereas material and energy metabolism were decreased. Of them, stimulus response, inflammatory reaction and regulation of apoptosis, etc. were stronger in AHF occurrence than in LR, but ion homeostasis, hormonal response, regulation of cell division and proliferation, etc. were weaker in AHF occurrence. Gene expression changes and physiological activities of AHF and those of LR not only have similarities but also differences.

摘要

为了探索大鼠肝再生(LR)与急性肝衰竭(AHF)的相关性,本研究采用大鼠基因组 230 2.0 阵列检测其基因表达谱,并通过实时 PCR 验证检测结果的可靠性。在 AHF 发生时发现 1012 个基因发生显著变化,在 LR 中发现 948 个基因发生显著变化。层次聚类分析表明,AHF 和 LR 的生理活动没有时间相关性。层次聚类分析(用于根据表达模式的相似性对基因进行分组)表明,AHF 和 LR 的生理活动没有时间相关性。K-均值聚类分析(用于检查不同组之间相关预测变量的差异是否显著)表明,AHF 中 C1 组(与刺激反应和细胞凋亡等类别相关的基因)和 LR 中的基因表达趋势非常相似,其 C2 组(与内稳态调节和激素刺激等类别相关的基因)则相反,其 C3(物质和能量代谢及氧化还原等)、C4(细胞周期相关基因)和 C5(细胞增殖相关基因)组也与 LR 的基因表达变化相似,且 LR 的基因表达变化更为丰富。GO 分类和功能聚类分析(用于统计蛋白质或基因在功能水平上的数量或组成)表明,免疫反应、炎症反应、细胞迁移和粘附等细胞过程在 AHF 和 LR 中均增加,而物质和能量代谢减少。其中,刺激反应、炎症反应和凋亡调节等在 AHF 发生时比在 LR 中更为强烈,但离子内稳态、激素反应、细胞分裂和增殖调节等在 AHF 发生时较弱。AHF 和 LR 的基因表达变化和生理活动不仅有相似之处,也有差异。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles of acute hepatic failure and that of liver regeneration in rat.急性肝衰竭和肝再生大鼠基因表达谱的比较分析。
Gene. 2013 Oct 10;528(2):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
Comparative analysis of the role of JNK signaling pathway in regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis of rat liver regeneration and rat acute hepatic failure.JNK信号通路在调节大鼠肝再生和大鼠急性肝衰竭细胞增殖与凋亡中作用的比较分析
Genetika. 2012 Aug;48(8):909-17.
3
Gene expression profiles reveal significant differences between rat liver cancer and liver regeneration.基因表达谱揭示了大鼠肝癌和肝再生之间的显著差异。
Gene. 2012 Aug 1;504(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.04.086. Epub 2012 May 7.
4
Correlation analysis between gene expression profile of high-fat emulsion-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver and liver regeneration in rat.高脂肪乳剂诱导的非酒精性脂肪肝大鼠基因表达谱与肝再生的相关性分析。
Cell Biol Int. 2013 Sep;37(9):917-28. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10118. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
5
Interleukin 18 accelerates the hepatic cell proliferation in rat liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy.白细胞介素 18 加速大鼠肝部分切除术后肝再生时的肝细胞增殖。
Gene. 2014 Mar 10;537(2):230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.12.062. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Genome-wide expression profiling of hepatic oval cells after partial hepatectomy in rats.大鼠部分肝切除术后肝卵圆细胞的全基因组表达谱分析。
Tissue Cell. 2011 Oct;43(5):291-303. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
7
Acute hepatic failure-derived bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells express hepatic progenitor cell genes.急性肝衰竭来源的骨髓间充质干细胞表达肝祖细胞基因。
Cells Tissues Organs. 2011;194(5):371-81. doi: 10.1159/000322604. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
8
Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in dendritic cells from rat regenerating liver after partial hepatectomy.部分肝切除后大鼠再生肝树突状细胞基因表达的全基因组分析。
Cell Biochem Funct. 2011 Apr;29(3):255-64. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1748. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
9
Gene expression profiles predict the possible regulatory role of OPN-mediated signaling pathways in rat liver regeneration.基因表达谱预测 OPN 介导的信号通路在大鼠肝再生中可能的调节作用。
Gene. 2016 Feb 1;576(2 Pt 2):782-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
10
The number of the genes in a functional category matters during rat liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy.在大鼠肝部分切除术后的肝再生过程中,功能类别中的基因数量很重要。
J Cell Biochem. 2011 Nov;112(11):3194-205. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23246.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of IL-17RA in the proliferative priming of hepatocytes in liver regeneration.IL-17RA 在肝脏再生中肝细胞增殖启动中的作用。
Cell Cycle. 2018;17(21-22):2423-2435. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1542893. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
2
Cylindrospermopsin toxicity in mice following a 90-d oral exposure.在 90 天的口服暴露后,小鼠中的圆柱鱼腥藻毒素毒性。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2018;81(13):549-566. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1460787. Epub 2018 Apr 25.