Garcia-Diaz Silvia, Girabent-Farrés Montserrat, Roig-Vilaseca Daniel, Reina Delia, Cerdà Dacia, González Marina, Torrente-Segarra Vicenç, Fíguls Ramon, Corominas Hèctor
Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Moisès Broggi Sant Joan Despí, Consorci Sanitari Integral CSI, Barcelona, España.
Enferm Clin. 2013 Jul-Aug;23(4):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
The aims of this study are to evaluate the level of fear of post-injection pain prior to the administration, the difficulty in handling the device, and the level of satisfaction of patients using a pre-filled syringe versus an etanercept pen, as well as to evaluate the usefulness of the training given by nursing staff prior to starting with the pen, and the preferences of patients after using both devices.
A prospective study was designed to follow-up a cohort of patients during a 6 months period. The data was collected using questionnaires and analyzed with SPSS 18.00. Rank and McNemar tests were performed. Statistical significance was pre-set at an α level of 0.05.
A total of 29 patients were included, of whom 69% female, and with a mean age 52.5±10.9 years. Of these, 48% had rheumatoid arthritis, 28% psoriatic arthritis, 21% ankylosing spondylitis, and 3% undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy. There were no statistically significant differences either with the fear or pain or handling of the device between the syringe and the pen (P=.469; P=.812; P=.169 respectively). At 6 months, 59% of patients referred to being satisfied or very satisfied with the pen. Almost all (93%) found useful or very useful the training given by nursing staff prior to using the pen, and 55% preferred the pen over the pre-filled syringe.
The etanercept pen is another subcutaneous device option for patients with chronic arthritis. According to the present study, nursing educational workshops before starting this therapy are recommended.
本研究旨在评估给药前对注射后疼痛的恐惧程度、设备操作难度,以及使用预填充注射器与依那西普笔的患者的满意度,同时评估护理人员在开始使用笔之前提供的培训的有用性,以及患者在使用两种设备后的偏好。
设计了一项前瞻性研究,对一组患者进行为期6个月的随访。使用问卷收集数据,并使用SPSS 18.00进行分析。进行秩和检验与McNemar检验。统计学显著性预先设定为α水平为0.05。
共纳入29例患者,其中69%为女性,平均年龄52.5±10.9岁。其中,48%患有类风湿性关节炎,28%患有银屑病关节炎,21%患有强直性脊柱炎,3%患有未分化脊柱关节病。注射器和笔在对设备的恐惧、疼痛或操作方面均无统计学显著差异(分别为P = 0.469;P = 0.812;P = 0.169)。6个月时,59%的患者表示对笔满意或非常满意。几乎所有患者(93%)认为护理人员在使用笔之前提供的培训有用或非常有用,55%的患者更喜欢笔而不是预填充注射器。
依那西普笔是慢性关节炎患者的另一种皮下给药设备选择。根据本研究,建议在开始这种治疗之前举办护理教育研讨会。