Suppr超能文献

适形调强放射治疗与点扫描束质子治疗用于同侧头颈部恶性肿瘤的比较:一项治疗计划对比研究

Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison.

作者信息

Kandula Shravan, Zhu Xiaorong, Garden Adam S, Gillin Michael, Rosenthal David I, Ang Kie-Kian, Mohan Radhe, Amin Mayankkumar V, Garcia John A, Wu Richard, Sahoo Narayan, Frank Steven J

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2013 Winter;38(4):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

Abstract

Radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies can have side effects that impede quality of life. Theoretically, proton therapy can reduce treatment-related morbidity by minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. We evaluated the feasibility of spot-scanning proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and compared dosimetry between those plans and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Plans from 5 patients who had undergone IMRT for primary tumors of the head and neck were used for planning proton therapy. Both sets of plans were prepared using computed tomography (CT) scans with the goals of achieving 100% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and 95% to the planning TV (PTV) while maximizing conformity to the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were generated and compared, as were conformity indexes (CIs) to the PTVs and mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Both modalities in all cases achieved 100% of the dose to the CTV and 95% to the PTV. Mean PTV CIs were comparable (0.371 IMRT, 0.374 protons, p = 0.953). Mean doses were significantly lower in the proton plans to the contralateral submandibular (638.7 cGy IMRT, 4.3 cGy protons, p = 0.002) and parotid (533.3 cGy IMRT, 48.5 cGy protons, p = 0.003) glands; oral cavity (1760.4 cGy IMRT, 458.9 cGy protons, p = 0.003); spinal cord (2112.4 cGy IMRT, 249.2 cGy protons, p = 0.002); and brainstem (1553.52 cGy IMRT, 166.2 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Proton plans also produced lower maximum doses to the spinal cord (3692.1 cGy IMRT, 2014.8 cGy protons, p = 0.034) and brainstem (3412.1 cGy IMRT, 1387.6 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Normal tissue V10, V30, and V50 values were also significantly lower in the proton plans. We conclude that spot-scanning proton therapy can significantly reduce the integral dose to head and neck critical structures. Prospective studies are underway to determine if this reduced dose translates to improved quality of life.

摘要

头颈部恶性肿瘤的放射治疗可能会产生影响生活质量的副作用。从理论上讲,质子治疗可以通过将关键正常组织的剂量降至最低来降低与治疗相关的发病率。我们评估了对头颈部恶性肿瘤进行点扫描质子治疗的可行性,并比较了这些计划与调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划之间的剂量测定。使用5例因头颈部原发性肿瘤接受IMRT治疗的患者的计划来制定质子治疗计划。两组计划均使用计算机断层扫描(CT)进行准备,目标是使临床靶区(CTV)达到规定剂量的100%,计划靶区(PTV)达到95%,同时最大程度地符合PTV。生成并比较了剂量体积直方图,以及PTV的适形指数(CI)和危及器官(OAR)的平均剂量。在所有病例中,两种治疗方式均使CTV达到100%的剂量,PTV达到95%的剂量。PTV的平均CI具有可比性(IMRT为0.371,质子治疗为0.374,p = 0.953)。质子治疗计划中,对侧颌下腺(IMRT为638.7 cGy,质子治疗为4.3 cGy,p = 0.002)、腮腺(IMRT为533.3 cGy,质子治疗为48.5 cGy,p = 0.003)、口腔(IMRT为1760.4 cGy,质子治疗为458.9 cGy,p = 0.003)、脊髓(IMRT为2112.4 cGy,质子治疗为249.2 cGy,p = 0.002)和脑干(IMRT为1553.52 cGy,质子治疗为166.2 cGy,p = 0.005)的平均剂量显著更低。质子治疗计划对脊髓(IMRT为3692.1 cGy,质子治疗为2014.8 cGy,p = 0.034)和脑干(IMRT为3412.1 cGy,质子治疗为1387.6 cGy,p = 0.005)产生的最大剂量也更低。质子治疗计划中正常组织的V10、V30和V50值也显著更低。我们得出结论,点扫描质子治疗可以显著降低对头颈部关键结构的积分剂量。正在进行前瞻性研究以确定这种降低的剂量是否能转化为生活质量的改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验