• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[再次主动脉瓣置换术;近期进展]

[Reoperative aortic valve replacement; recent update].

作者信息

Saito Satoshi, Yamazaki Kenji

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery ,Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Kyobu Geka. 2013 Jul;66(8 Suppl):625-30.

PMID:23917175
Abstract

Historically, redo cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is technically challenging and carries a high incidence of peri-operative complications. However, experience in the field continues to evolve generating reproducible, and increasingly safer results. Recent low initial operative mortalitysuggests that surgery is safe and reproducible. However, older age and multiple co-morbidities in this patient population may significantly influence late outcomes. The published data support open surgical technique as a safe, reliable approach for redo AVR. Minimum invasive approach for redo AVR and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) technology are evolving rapidly and promises an exciting future. Careful observation for these new alternative options for redo AVR is mandatory and paramount.

摘要

从历史上看,再次进行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的心脏手术在技术上具有挑战性,围手术期并发症的发生率很高。然而,该领域的经验不断发展,产生了可重复且日益安全的结果。近期较低的初始手术死亡率表明手术是安全且可重复的。然而,该患者群体的高龄和多种合并症可能会显著影响远期预后。已发表的数据支持开放手术技术是再次进行AVR的一种安全、可靠的方法。再次进行AVR的微创方法和经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)技术正在迅速发展,并预示着一个令人兴奋的未来。必须密切关注这些再次进行AVR的新替代选择,这至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Reoperative aortic valve replacement; recent update].[再次主动脉瓣置换术;近期进展]
Kyobu Geka. 2013 Jul;66(8 Suppl):625-30.
2
Midterm outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting.先前冠状动脉旁路移植术后行主动脉瓣置换术患者的中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;42(5):819-24; discussion 824-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs070. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
3
Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement.再次行主动脉瓣置换时生物瓣与机械瓣使用的长期评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;144(1):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.041. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
4
Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.使用圣犹达医疗公司人工瓣膜进行主动脉或二尖瓣置换再次手术患者的长期随访。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2010 Jul;19(4):473-84.
5
Simultaneous transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve implantation in a patient with degenerated bioprostheses and high surgical risk.一名生物假体退化且手术风险高的患者同时行经导管主动脉瓣和二尖瓣瓣中瓣植入术。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;59(8):490-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280368. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
6
Conduction disturbances and permanent cardiac pacing after transcatheter implantation of the CoreValve aortic bioprosthesis: initial single centre experience.经导管植入 CoreValve 主动脉生物瓣后的传导障碍和永久性心脏起搏:初始单中心经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(2):121-8.
7
Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge.无支架主动脉瓣再次手术:一项外科挑战。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Sep;84(3):737-43; discussion 743-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.061.
8
Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?再次主动脉瓣置换术:既往同种异体移植瓣膜会影响手术结果吗?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Nov;13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3.
9
Failing stentless aortic valves: redo aortic root replacement or valve in a valve?无支架主动脉瓣失效:再次行主动脉根部置换术还是行瓣中瓣技术?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Mar;43(3):495-504. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs335. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
10
Transapical valve-in-valve implantation for regurgitant stented aortic bioprostheses.经心尖瓣膜内瓣膜植入术治疗带支架主动脉生物瓣膜反流
J Heart Valve Dis. 2012 May;21(3):344-9.