Suppr超能文献

乳突腔填塞并植入 Vibrant Soundbridge 治疗混合性听力损失患者。

Mastoid cavity obliteration and Vibrant Soundbridge implantation for patients with mixed hearing loss.

机构信息

Department for Otolaryngology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2014 Feb;124(2):531-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24180. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To review the results of obliteration of a preexisting mastoid cavity with abdominal fat and Vibrant Soundbridge implantation in patients with mixed hearing loss (MHL) and to compare the data with results of Vibrant Soundbridge implantation in patients with MHL without mastoid cavity and with pure sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart analysis of 10 patients (10 ears) with MHL and preexisting mastoid cavity, 18 patients (19 ears) with MHL alone and nine patients (10 ears) with SNHL treated in one tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Vibrant Soundbridge implantation and obliteration in case a mastoid cavity existed previously. Pure tone audiometry (average air-bone gap, average functional gain), speech audiometry (Freiburg Monosyllabic Test) and complication rate were main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Postoperative average air-bone gap was -15.1 ± 21.2 dB in patients with MHL with mastoid cavity obliteration, -7.2 ± 11.4 dB in patients with MHL without mastoid cavity, and -5.7 ± 11.2 dB in patients with SNHL. Average functional gain was 40.0 ± 23.5 dB, 39.7 ± 12.1 dB, and 9.5 ± 10.6 dB. Postoperative speech discrimination rate was 77.9 ± 20.8%, 83.3 ± 13.6%, and 83.6 ± 6.3%. No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Mastoid cavity obliteration during Vibrant Soundbridge implantation in patients with MHL and preexisting mastoid cavity is a safe procedure. The audiometric results are satisfying and comparable to those of other patient groups implanted with the same device.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

目的/假设:回顾在患有混合性听力损失(MHL)的患者中,使用腹部脂肪和 Vibrant Soundbridge 植入物封闭先前存在的乳突腔的结果,并将数据与未进行乳突腔封闭且患有 MHL 伴纯感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的患者的 Vibrant Soundbridge 植入物结果进行比较。

研究设计

对在一家三级转诊中心接受治疗的 10 例(10 耳)患有 MHL 和先前存在乳突腔的患者、18 例(19 耳)仅患有 MHL 的患者和 9 例(10 耳)患有 SNHL 的患者进行回顾性图表分析。

方法

在存在乳突腔的情况下进行 Vibrant Soundbridge 植入和封闭。主要观察指标为纯音听阈测试(平均气骨导差,平均功能增益)、言语测听(弗赖堡单音节测试)和并发症发生率。

结果

MHL 伴乳突腔封闭患者术后平均气骨导差为-15.1±21.2dB,MHL 无乳突腔患者为-7.2±11.4dB,SNHL 患者为-5.7±11.2dB。平均功能增益分别为 40.0±23.5dB、39.7±12.1dB 和 9.5±10.6dB。术后言语辨别率分别为 77.9±20.8%、83.3±13.6%和 83.6±6.3%。未观察到严重的术中或术后并发症。

结论

在患有 MHL 和先前存在乳突腔的患者中,在进行 Vibrant Soundbridge 植入物时封闭乳突腔是一种安全的方法。听力测试结果令人满意,与使用相同设备植入的其他患者群体的结果相当。

证据等级

4 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验