Wehrle Elisabeth, Bircher Andreas J
Klinik für Infektiologie und Spitalhygiene, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2013 Aug 7;102(16):973-9. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a001374.
When there is the suspicion of an allergic reaction to betalactam-antibiotics, the allergological evaluation is an important tool to confirm the allergy and to test alternative medicaments. As all the testing methods for the allergologic evaluation (cutaneous tests and in-vitro tests) don't have a high sensitivity, a broad case report and the former documentation of the symptoms and diagnostic findings are essential, to enable a high significance of the examination and to assess the indication for the provocation test which is the gold standard in many cases. The documentation of the time flow is basic, to differentiate between immediate reactions (hours after intake) and nonimmediate reactions (several days after intake). The diagnostic evaluation not later than after six months increases the prospects for a successful allergic evaluation.
当怀疑对β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏时,过敏科评估是确认过敏和测试替代药物的重要工具。由于过敏科评估的所有检测方法(皮肤试验和体外试验)灵敏度都不高,详细的病例报告以及既往症状和诊断结果的记录至关重要,以便使检查具有较高的显著性,并评估激发试验的指征,在许多情况下激发试验是金标准。记录时间流程是基础,以区分即刻反应(服药后数小时)和非即刻反应(服药后数天)。不迟于六个月进行诊断评估可增加过敏评估成功的可能性。