Poisot Timothée, Stanko Michal, Miklisová Dana, Morand Serge
Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Canada.
Parasitology. 2013 Sep;140(11):1340-5. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013000851. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
Network theory is gaining momentum as a descriptive tool in community ecology. Because organisms with the same lifestyle can still exhibit ecological differences, it is crucial to determine the scale at which networks should be described. Here we show that networks of hosts (mammals) and parasites (ectoparasitic gamasid mites) differ when either facultative or obligatory parasites only are considered. More importantly, the structure of these networks is opposed, with obligatory parasites networks being more modular, and facultative parasites networks being more nested. Our results have consequences for the way we define which species to include in ecological networks, which we discuss in the light of community ecology and epidemiology.
网络理论作为一种描述工具,在群落生态学中越来越受到关注。由于具有相同生活方式的生物仍可能表现出生态差异,因此确定描述网络的尺度至关重要。在这里,我们表明,当仅考虑兼性寄生虫或专性寄生虫时,宿主(哺乳动物)和寄生虫(体外寄生革螨)的网络是不同的。更重要的是,这些网络的结构是相反的,专性寄生虫网络更具模块性,而兼性寄生虫网络更具嵌套性。我们的研究结果对我们定义生态网络中应包含哪些物种的方式产生了影响,我们将根据群落生态学和流行病学进行讨论。