• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为患者信息来源的临床文档——可能性与局限性。

Clinical documentation as a source of information for patients - possibilities and limitations.

作者信息

Wibe Torunn, Ekstedt Mirjam, Hellesø Ragnhild, Øyri Karl, Slaughter Laura

机构信息

Centre for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:793-7.

PMID:23920666
Abstract

Recent legislation in many countries has given patients the right to access their own patient records. Making health-care professionals' assessments and decisions more transparent by giving patients access to their records is expected to provide patients with useful health information and reduce the power imbalance between patient and provider. We conducted both a mail survey and a face-to-face interview study, including patients who had requested a paper copy of their patient records (EPR), to explore their experiences. For many study participants, a view of their records filled in holes in the oral information they previously received. They had problems understanding parts of what they read, but rarely asked for help. Instead they searched for explanations on the Internet or attempted to understand based on the context. Patients are still afraid of seeming suspicious or displeased if they indicate that they would like to read their records. Health-care organizations should consider actively offering patients the chance to view their clinical documentation to a larger extent than what has been done so far.

摘要

许多国家最近颁布的法律赋予了患者查阅自己病历的权利。通过让患者查阅病历,使医疗保健专业人员的评估和决策更加透明,有望为患者提供有用的健康信息,并减少医患之间的权力失衡。我们进行了一项邮件调查和一项面对面访谈研究,研究对象包括那些索要过纸质电子病历(EPR)的患者,以探究他们的经历。对于许多参与研究的患者来说,查看病历填补了他们之前所获口头信息中的空白。他们在理解所读内容的部分信息时存在困难,但很少寻求帮助。相反,他们在互联网上搜索解释内容,或者试图根据上下文来理解。如果患者表示想阅读自己的病历,他们仍然担心显得可疑或不悦。医疗保健机构应考虑比目前更大程度地积极为患者提供查看其临床文档的机会。

相似文献

1
Clinical documentation as a source of information for patients - possibilities and limitations.作为患者信息来源的临床文档——可能性与局限性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:793-7.
2
Provider documentation of patient education: a lean investigation.医疗服务提供者关于患者教育的文档记录:一项精益调查。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Apr;104(2):154-8. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.012.
3
CMS launches pilot test of personal health records for Medicare beneficiaries in South Carolina.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心在南卡罗来纳州启动针对医疗保险受益人的个人健康记录试点测试。
Home Healthc Nurse. 2008 Sep;26(8):450. doi: 10.1097/01.NHH.0000335599.63903.92.
4
Shining a light on patient engagement. How one hospital places the tools for engagement in the hands of the patients.照亮患者参与度。一家医院如何将参与工具交到患者手中。
Healthc Inform. 2013 Sep;30(6):34-5.
5
Patient activation and use of an electronic patient portal.患者对电子患者门户的激活与使用。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2015;40(3):254-66. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2014.908200. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
6
Patients' perceptions of a health information exchange: a pilot program in South Korea.患者对健康信息交换的看法:韩国的一个试点项目。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 30.
7
Increasing patient engagement: patients' responses to viewing problem lists online.提高患者参与度:患者对在线查看问题列表的反应。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Nov 26;5(4):930-42. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-07-RA-0057. eCollection 2014.
8
A comparison of approaches to providing patients access to summary care records across old and new europe: an exploration of facilitators and barriers to implementation.新旧欧洲地区为患者提供综合医疗记录访问途径的方法比较:实施过程中的促进因素与障碍探索
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:397-401.
9
Considering Governance for Patient Access to E-Medical Records.关于患者获取电子病历的治理考量
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;214:29-35.
10
Online health information seeking in the context of the medical consultation in Switzerland.瑞士医疗咨询背景下的在线健康信息寻求。
Qual Health Res. 2010 Aug;20(8):1050-61. doi: 10.1177/1049732310368404. Epub 2010 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Documentation After Implementing Open Notes in Mental Health Care: Pre-Post Mixed Methods Study.在精神卫生保健中实施开放病历后的文档记录变化:前后混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Sep 3;27:e72667. doi: 10.2196/72667.