Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Trials. 2013 Aug 7;14:245. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-245.
The optimal management of acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) associated with preexisting canal stenosis remains to be established. The objective of this study is to examine whether early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) would result in greater improvement in motor function compared with delayed surgery (later than two weeks) in cervical SCI patients presenting with canal stenosis, but without bony injury.
METHODS/DESIGN: OSCIS is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, multicenter trial. We will recruit 100 cervical SCI patients who are admitted within 48 hours of injury (aged 20 to 79 years; without fractures or dislocations; American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade C; preexisting spinal canal stenosis). Patients will be enrolled from 36 participating hospitals across Japan and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) or delayed surgery following at least two weeks of conservative treatment. The primary outcomes include: 1) the change from baseline to one year in the ASIA motor score; 2) the total score of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure and 3) the proportion of patients who are able to walk without human assistance. The secondary outcomes are: 1) the health-related quality of life as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and the EuroQol 5 Dimension; 2) the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and 3) the walking status as evaluated with the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II. The analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary analysis will be a comparison of the primary and secondary outcomes one year after the injury.
The results of this study will provide evidence of the potential benefit of early surgical decompression compared to the current 'watch and wait' strategy.
对于伴有先前椎管狭窄的急性颈脊髓损伤(SCI),最佳的治疗方案仍有待确定。本研究旨在探究对于存在椎管狭窄、但无骨折或脱位的急性颈 SCI 患者,早期手术减压(伤后 24 小时内)是否比延迟手术(伤后两周以上)能带来更好的运动功能改善。
方法/设计:OSCIS 是一项随机、对照、平行分组、评估者设盲、多中心试验。我们将招募 100 例在损伤后 48 小时内入院的颈 SCI 患者(年龄 20-79 岁;无骨折或脱位;美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级 C;存在先前椎管狭窄)。这些患者将来自日本 36 家参与医院,按照 1:1 的比例随机分配至早期手术减压组(伤后 24 小时内)或延迟手术组(至少 2 周保守治疗后)。主要结局包括:1)从基线到 1 年时 ASIA 运动评分的变化;2)脊髓独立性测量总评分;3)无需他人协助即可行走的患者比例。次要结局包括:1)使用医疗结局研究简表 36 项健康调查和欧洲五维健康量表评估的健康相关生活质量;2)神经病性疼痛症状量表;3)脊髓损伤步行指数 II 评估的步行状况。分析将基于意向治疗原则。主要分析将在损伤后 1 年比较主要和次要结局。
该研究结果将为早期手术减压与当前“观察等待”策略相比的潜在获益提供证据。