Zheng Dingchang, Pan Fan, Murray Alan
Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Blood Press Monit. 2013 Oct;18(5):265-71. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283651d55.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery on blood pressure (BP) measurements during cuff inflation and deflation.
BP measurements were taken from each of 40 participants, with three repeat sessions under three randomized cuff deflation/inflation conditions. Cuff pressure was linearly deflated and inflated at a standard rate of 2-3 mmHg/s and also linearly inflated at a fast rate of 5-6 mmHg/s. Manual auscultatory systolic and diastolic BPs, and pulse pressure (SBP, DBP, PP) were measured. Automated BPs were determined from digitally recorded cuff pressures by fitting a polynomial model to the oscillometric pulse amplitudes. The BPs from cuff deflation and inflation were then compared.
Repeatable measurements between sessions and between the sequential order of inflation/deflation conditions (all P > 0.1) indicated stability of arterial mechanical behaviour with repeat measurements. Comparing BPs obtained by standard inflation with those from standard deflation, manual SBP was 2.6 mmHg lower (P < 0.01), manual DBP was 1.5 mmHg higher (P < 0.01), manual PP was 4.2 mmHg lower (P < 0.001), automated DBP was 6.7 mmHg higher (P < 0.001) and automatic PP was 7.5 mmHg lower (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for any automated BPs between fast and standard cuff inflation. The statistically significant BP differences between inflation and deflation suggest different arterial mechanical behaviour between arterial opening and closing during BP measurement.
We have shown that the mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery during BP measurement differs between cuff deflation and cuff inflation.
本研究旨在探讨肱动脉不同力学行为对袖带充气和放气过程中血压测量的影响。
对40名参与者进行血压测量,在三种随机的袖带放气/充气条件下进行三次重复测量。袖带压力以2 - 3 mmHg/s的标准速率线性放气和充气,也以5 - 6 mmHg/s的快速率线性充气。测量手动听诊收缩压和舒张压以及脉压(SBP、DBP、PP)。通过将多项式模型拟合到示波脉搏幅度,从数字记录的袖带压力中确定自动血压。然后比较袖带放气和充气时的血压。
各测量时段之间以及充气/放气条件的顺序之间的可重复测量结果(所有P>0.1)表明重复测量时动脉力学行为具有稳定性。将标准充气获得的血压与标准放气获得的血压进行比较,手动测量的SBP低2.6 mmHg(P<0.01),手动测量的DBP高1.5 mmHg(P<0.01),手动测量的PP低4.2 mmHg(P<0.001),自动测量的DBP高6.7 mmHg(P<0.001),自动测量的PP低7.5 mmHg(P<0.001)。快速袖带充气和标准袖带充气之间的任何自动血压测量值均无统计学显著差异。充气和放气之间具有统计学显著差异的血压表明在血压测量过程中动脉开放和关闭期间动脉力学行为不同。
我们已经表明,在血压测量过程中,肱动脉在袖带放气和袖带充气时的力学行为有所不同。