Suppr超能文献

用柯氏音法测量肱动脉血压,当袖带充气时,血压值平均比袖带放气时高。

Measuring blood pressure from Korotkoff sounds as the brachial cuff inflates on average provides higher values than when the cuff deflates.

机构信息

Biomedical Systems Research Laboratory in the School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2024 Jun 4;45(5). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad39a2.

Abstract

. In this study, we test the hypothesis that if, as demonstrated in a previous study, brachial arteries exhibit hysteresis as the occluding cuff is deflated and fail to open until cuff pressure (CP) is well below true intra-arterial blood pressure (IAPB), estimating systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from the presence of Korotkoff sounds (KS) as CP increases may eliminate these errors and give more accurate estimates of SBP and DBP relative to IABP readings.. In 62 subjects of varying ages (45.1 ± 19.8, range 20.6-75.8 years), including 44 men (45.3 ± 19.4, range 20.6-75.8 years) and 18 women (44.4 ± 21.4, range 20.9-75.3 years), we sequentially recorded SBP and DBP both during cuff inflation and cuff deflation using KS.. There was a significant (< 0.0001) increase in SBP from 122.8 ± 13.2 to 127.6 ± 13.0 mmHg and a significant (= 0.0001) increase in DBP from 70.0 ± 9.0 to 77.5 ± 9.7 mmHg. Of the 62 subjects, 51 showed a positive increase in SBP (0-14 mmHg) and 11 subjects showed a reduction (-0.3 to -7 mmHg). The average differences for SBP and DBP estimates derived as the cuff inflates and those derived as the cuff deflates were 4.8 ± 4.6 mmHg and 2.5 ± 4.6 mmHg, not dissimilar to the differences reported between IABP and non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Although we could not develop multiparameter linear or non-linear models to explain this phenomenon we have clearly demonstrated through ANOVA tests that both body mass index (BMI) and pulse wave velocity are implicated, supporting the hypothesis that the phenomenon is associated with age, higher BMI and stiffer arteries.. The implications of this study are that brachial sphygmomanometry carried out during cuff inflation could be more accurate than measurements carried out as the cuff deflates. Further research is required to validate these results with IAPB measurements.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们验证了一个假设,如果正如之前的研究所示,肱动脉在充气袖带放气时表现出滞后,并且在袖带压力(CP)远低于真正的动脉内血压(IAPB)时无法打开,那么从 CP 升高时出现的柯氏音(KS)来估计收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)可能会消除这些误差,并相对于 IABP 读数更准确地估计 SBP 和 DBP。 在 62 名年龄不同的受试者(45.1 ± 19.8,范围 20.6-75.8 岁)中,包括 44 名男性(45.3 ± 19.4,范围 20.6-75.8 岁)和 18 名女性(44.4 ± 21.4,范围 20.9-75.3 岁),我们使用 KS 依次记录充气袖带和放气袖带时的 SBP 和 DBP。 SBP 从 122.8 ± 13.2 显著增加至 127.6 ± 13.0 mmHg(<0.0001),DBP 从 70.0 ± 9.0 显著增加至 77.5 ± 9.7 mmHg(= 0.0001)。 在 62 名受试者中,51 名受试者的 SBP 呈阳性增加(0-14 mmHg),11 名受试者的 SBP 呈下降趋势(-0.3 至-7 mmHg)。 作为袖带充气时和作为袖带放气时得出的 SBP 和 DBP 估计值之间的平均差异分别为 4.8 ± 4.6 mmHg 和 2.5 ± 4.6 mmHg,与 IABP 和非侵入性血压测量之间报道的差异相似。 尽管我们无法开发多参数线性或非线性模型来解释这种现象,但通过方差分析测试,我们清楚地表明,体重指数(BMI)和脉搏波速度都与此有关,支持这种现象与年龄、更高的 BMI 和更硬的动脉有关的假设。 这项研究的意义在于,在充气袖带期间进行的肱动脉血压测量可能比在袖带放气时进行的测量更准确。 需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果与 IAPB 测量的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验