• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注射生长激素:持续的噩梦还是可控的麻烦?一种新型无针装置的评估。

Transjecting growth hormone: continuous nightmare or controlled nuisance? Evaluation of a new needle-free device.

作者信息

Kaptein Ad A

机构信息

Medical Psychology Section, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jul 24;7:703-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S46990. Print 2013.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S46990
PMID:23926423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3728268/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Administering growth-hormone therapy (GHT) is a long-term treatment, associated with avoidance and phobic behaviors in the children involved. The current study examined GHT users' perceptions of a new needle-free device (ZomaJet Vision X [10 mg/mL]) with a lower injection volume compared to the traditional device.

METHODS

A total of 73 persons participated (mean age ± standard deviation, 10.10 ± 3.60 years) in a longitudinal design. Users' views were studied 4 weeks after having applied both the old and the new device for a period of at least 4 weeks. Satisfaction, ease and frequency of restitution, local sensations, bruises during administering GHT, affective response to local sensations, and subject preference were assessed on the basis of the users' responses.

RESULTS

Subjects' satisfaction with the new device was equal compared with the previous device for the total group of 73 children. However, the subgroup of 59 children who proved tolerant to meta-cresol (new preservative for Vision X only) reported a significantly higher satisfaction rating with the new device compared to the old device (7.7 vs 6.6, P=0.0002). Vision X was evaluated as better on ease and frequency of restitution and the number of bruises. Pain sensations did not differ meaningfully between the two devices. The new device was favored over the previous one in a majority of respondents. Vision X allows easy reconstitution of the solution, which was reflected in the percentage of young children able to prepare transjections themselves being more than doubled, illustrating the greater sense of empowerment in these users. Self-reported adherence to the therapy was good (less than 10% of injections missed) with both devices.

CONCLUSION

The new device ZomaJet Vision X appears to be evaluated more positively than the previous version on criteria that refect users' preferences.

摘要

背景

生长激素疗法(GHT)是一种长期治疗方法,会使接受治疗的儿童出现回避和恐惧行为。本研究调查了生长激素疗法使用者对一种新型无针装置(ZomaJet Vision X [10 mg/mL])的看法,该装置的注射量低于传统装置。

方法

共有73人(平均年龄±标准差,10.10±3.60岁)参与了一项纵向研究。在使用新旧两种装置至少4周后4周,研究使用者的观点。根据使用者的回答,评估满意度、恢复的难易程度和频率、局部感觉、注射生长激素时的瘀伤情况、对局部感觉的情感反应以及受试者的偏好。

结果

在73名儿童的总群体中,受试者对新装置的满意度与之前的装置相当。然而,在59名对间甲酚(仅为Vision X的新型防腐剂)耐受的儿童亚组中,与旧装置相比,新装置的满意度评分显著更高(7.7对6.6,P = 0.0002)。Vision X在恢复的难易程度和频率以及瘀伤数量方面被评价为更好。两种装置在疼痛感觉上没有显著差异。在大多数受访者中,新装置比之前的装置更受青睐。Vision X使溶液易于复溶,这体现在能够自己准备注射的幼儿比例增加了一倍多,说明这些使用者的自主感更强。两种装置的自我报告治疗依从性都很好(错过的注射少于10%)。

结论

在反映使用者偏好的标准方面,新型装置ZomaJet Vision X似乎比之前的版本得到了更积极的评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/f7e56ca0c1dd/ppa-7-703Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/1078820f40be/ppa-7-703Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/19cb63613b1d/ppa-7-703Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/a1b4dfbc3cdf/ppa-7-703Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/f7e56ca0c1dd/ppa-7-703Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/1078820f40be/ppa-7-703Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/19cb63613b1d/ppa-7-703Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/a1b4dfbc3cdf/ppa-7-703Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8e/3728268/f7e56ca0c1dd/ppa-7-703Fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Transjecting growth hormone: continuous nightmare or controlled nuisance? Evaluation of a new needle-free device.注射生长激素:持续的噩梦还是可控的麻烦?一种新型无针装置的评估。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jul 24;7:703-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S46990. Print 2013.
2
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new formulation of recombinant human growth hormone administered by ZomaJet 2 Vision, a new needle-free device, compared to subcutaneous administration using a conventional syringe.与使用传统注射器皮下给药相比,通过新型无针装置ZomaJet 2 Vision给药的重组人生长激素新制剂的药代动力学和药效学。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;42(11):1262-8. doi: 10.1177/009127002762491361.
3
Maintaining persistence and adherence with subcutaneous growth-hormone therapy in children: comparing jet-delivery and needle-based devices.维持儿童皮下生长激素治疗的持续性和依从性:比较喷射式给药装置和基于针头的装置。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Sep 17;8:1255-63. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S70019. eCollection 2014.
4
Ease of use and preference for a new disposable self-injection pen compared with a reusable pen for administering recombinant human growth hormone: A multicenter, 2-month, single-arm, open-label clinical trial in patient-caregiver dyads.在患者-照护者配对中,比较新的一次性自注笔与可重复使用笔用于重组人生长激素给药的易用性和偏好:一项多中心、2 个月、单臂、开放性标签临床试验。
Clin Ther. 2010 Nov;32(12):2036-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.11.007.
5
Psychological responses to the needle-free Medi-Jector or the multidose Disetronic injection pen in human growth hormone therapy.在人生长激素治疗中,对无针Medi-Jector或多剂量Disetronic注射笔的心理反应。
Acta Paediatr. 1998 Feb;87(2):154-8. doi: 10.1080/08035259850157589.
6
The role of growth hormone device optimization in patient-reported outcomes: real-world evidence from South Korea.生长激素设备优化在患者报告结局中的作用:来自韩国的真实世界证据。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Jan;18(1):91-106. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1864324. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Ease of use and acceptability of a new pen device for the administration of growth hormone therapy in pediatric patients: an open-label, uncontrolled usability test.一种新的注射笔设备在儿科患者生长激素治疗中的使用便捷性和可接受性:一项开放性、非对照性使用测试。
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2906-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.014.
8
Growth Hormone Injection Log Analysis with Electronic Injection Device for Qualifying Adherence to Low-Irritant Formulation and Exploring Influential Factors on Adherence.使用电子注射装置进行生长激素注射记录分析,以评估对低刺激性制剂的依从性并探索影响依从性的因素。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Aug 1;17:1885-1894. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S417142. eCollection 2023.
9
User assessment of Norditropin NordiFlex(®), a new prefilled growth hormone pen: a Phase IV multicenter prospective study.新型预填充生长激素笔Norditropin NordiFlex(®)的用户评估:一项IV期多中心前瞻性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 May 24;7:455-62. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S43460. Print 2013.
10
Airway clearance devices for cystic fibrosis: an evidence-based analysis.用于囊性纤维化的气道清理装置:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(26):1-50. Epub 2009 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient preferences for prophylactic regimens requiring regular injections in children and adolescents: a systematic review and thematic analysis.患者对儿童和青少年需要定期注射的预防方案的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 May 20;8(1):e002450. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002450.
2
New insight into the importance of formulation variables on parenteral growth hormone preparations: potential effect on the injection-site pain.深入了解制剂变量对注射用生长激素制剂的重要性:对注射部位疼痛的潜在影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 3;13:963336. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.963336. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Parents' views on growth hormone treatment for their children: psychosocial issues.父母对其子女生长激素治疗的看法:心理社会问题
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:547-53. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S33157. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
2
Patient perceptions of epinephrine auto-injectors: exploring barriers to use.患者对肾上腺素自动注射器的认知:探索使用障碍
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):335-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01045.x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
3
Usage and perceptions of pen injectors for diabetes management: a survey of type 2 diabetes patients in the United States.
Maintaining persistence and adherence with subcutaneous growth-hormone therapy in children: comparing jet-delivery and needle-based devices.
维持儿童皮下生长激素治疗的持续性和依从性:比较喷射式给药装置和基于针头的装置。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Sep 17;8:1255-63. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S70019. eCollection 2014.
用于糖尿病管理的笔式注射器的使用情况与认知:美国2型糖尿病患者调查
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 May 1;6(3):686-94. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600325.
4
FlexTouch® for the delivery of insulin: technical attributes and perception among patients and healthcare professionals.FlexTouch® 用于胰岛素的输送:患者和医疗保健专业人员的技术特征和感知。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 May;9(3):209-17. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.13. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
5
Patient assessment of an electronic device for subcutaneous self-injection of interferon β-1a for multiple sclerosis: an observational study in the UK and Ireland.皮下自我注射干扰素β-1a治疗多发性硬化症的电子设备的患者评估:英国和爱尔兰的一项观察性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:55-61. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S26250. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
Patient perceptions of using the OmniPod system compared with conventional insulin pumps in young adults with type 1 diabetes.患者对使用 OmniPod 系统与传统胰岛素泵的感知在 1 型糖尿病的年轻成年人中的比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 May;14(5):411-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0228. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
7
Subcutaneous delivery of sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine and primary headache.舒马曲坦皮下给药治疗偏头痛和原发性头痛。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:27-37. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S19171. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
8
Evaluation of pharmacokinetics, user handling, and tolerability of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) delivered via a disposable autoinjector device.通过一次性自动注射器装置给药的聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a(40 kDa)的药代动力学、用户操作及耐受性评估。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:587-99. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S26566. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
9
An overview of 19 instruments assessing the doctor-patient relationship: different models or concepts are used.19 种评估医患关系的工具概述:使用了不同的模型或概念。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;65(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.011.
10
Management of distressing procedures in children and young people: time to adhere to the guidelines.儿童和青少年痛苦治疗程序的管理:是时候遵循指南了。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Jan;97(1):1-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300762. Epub 2011 Nov 13.