Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Suite 689, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(11):1391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
The cardiovascular effects of escitalopram were examined in a large group of participants in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Escitalopram (n=3298) was administered at doses between 5 and 20mg/day. Patients were treated in acute (8-12 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) studies. Assessment of cardiovascular safety included heart rate, blood pressure (BP), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and electrocardiograms (ECGs). In the short-term, there was a small, but statistically significant 2 beats per minute decrease in heart rate with escitalopram compared with placebo. The difference compared to placebo in systolic or diastolic BP was not clinically or statistically significant. Valid ECG assessments at both baseline and last assessment were available for 2407 escitalopram patients and 1952 placebo patients. Escitalopram-placebo differences in mean changes in ECG values were not clinically meaningful. The mean difference to placebo in the corrected QT [Fridericia's (QTcF)] interval was 3.5 ms (all escitalopram doses); 1.3 ms (escitalopram 10mg) and 1.7 ms (escitalopram 20mg) (p=0.2836 for 10 versus 20 mg). One out of 2407 escitalopram patients had a QTcF interval >500 ms and a change from baseline >60 ms. The incidence and types of cardiac-associated adverse events were similar between patients treated for 8-12 weeks with placebo (2.2%) or escitalopram (1.9%) and for 24 weeks with placebo (2.7%) or escitalopram (2.3%). Analyses of data from long-term studies and studies of the elderly showed similar results. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that escitalopram, like other SSRIs, has a statistically significant effect on heart rate and no clinically meaningful effect on ECG values, BP, with a placebo-level incidence of cardiac-associated adverse events.
在多项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究中,对依他普仑的心血管作用进行了考察。依他普仑(n=3298)的给药剂量为 5 至 20mg/天。患者接受了急性(8-12 周)和长期(24 周)研究的治疗。心血管安全性评估包括心率、血压(BP)、治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)和心电图(ECG)。在短期治疗中,与安慰剂相比,依他普仑使心率平均下降 2 次/分钟,但差异具有统计学意义。依他普仑与安慰剂相比,收缩压或舒张压的差异无临床或统计学意义。在 2407 名依他普仑患者和 1952 名安慰剂患者中,均有基线和最后评估时有效的 ECG 评估。依他普仑与安慰剂相比,ECG 值的平均变化差异无临床意义。依他普仑与安慰剂相比,校正 QT [Fridericia(QTcF)]间期的平均差异为 3.5 毫秒(所有依他普仑剂量);1.3 毫秒(依他普仑 10mg)和 1.7 毫秒(依他普仑 20mg)(10 毫克与 20 毫克相比,p=0.2836)。在 2407 名依他普仑患者中,有 1 名患者的 QTcF 间期>500 毫秒,且与基线相比变化>60 毫秒。接受 8-12 周安慰剂(2.2%)或依他普仑(1.9%)治疗和 24 周安慰剂(2.7%)或依他普仑(2.3%)治疗的患者的心脏相关不良事件的发生率和类型相似。来自长期研究和老年人研究的数据分析结果相似。总之,这些数据表明,依他普仑与其他 SSRIs 一样,对心率有统计学意义的影响,对 ECG 值、BP 无临床意义的影响,且心脏相关不良事件的发生率与安慰剂水平相当。