*Therapy Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom †Department of Allied Health Professions, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom; ‡Musculoskeletal Services, Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; §Therapy Department, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; ¶Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; ‖One Small Step Gait Laboratory, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom; **Department of Physical Therapy, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, TX; ††Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia; and ‡‡Division of Health and Social Care Research, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22):1905-12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a69956.
Multicenter, assessor-blind, randomized, clinical trial.
To compare the effectiveness of rocker sole footwear to traditional flat sole footwear as part of the management for people with low back pain (LBP).
During the past decade, persistent advertising has claimed that footwear constructed with a rocker sole will reduce LBP. However, there is no robust evidence to support these claims.
One hundred fifteen people with chronic LBP were randomized to wear rocker sole shoes or flat sole shoes for a minimum of 2 hours each day while standing and walking. Primary outcome was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). In addition, participants attended an exercise and education program once a week for 4 weeks and wore their assigned shoes during these sessions. Participants were assessed without their knowledge of group allocation prerandomization, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year (main outcome point). Analysis was by intention-to-treat method.
At 12 months, data from 44 of 58 (77.2%) of the rocker sole group and 49 of 57 (84.5%) of the flat sole group were available for analysis. In the rocker sole group, mean reduction in RMDQ was -3.1 (95% CI [confidence interval], -4.5 to -1.6), and in the flat sole group, it was -4.4 (95% CI, -5.8 to -3.1) (a greater negative value represents a greater reduction in disability). At 6 months, more people wearing flat shoes compared with those wearing rocker shoes demonstrated a minimal clinically important improvement in disability (53.2% and 31.1%, respectively; P = 0.03). Between-group differences were not significant for RMDQ or any secondary outcomes (e.g., pain) at any time. People reporting pain when standing and walking at baseline (n = 59) reported a greater reduction in RMDQ at 12 months in the flat sole group (-4.4 [95% CI, -6.0 to -2.8], n = 29) than the rocker sole group (-2.0 [95% CI, -3.6 to -0.4], n = 30) (P < 0.05).
Rocker sole shoes seem to be no more beneficial than flat sole shoes in affecting disability and pain outcomes in people with chronic LBP. Flat shoes are more beneficial for LBP aggravated by standing or walking.
N/A.
多中心、评估者盲法、随机临床试验。
比较鞋跟为弧形底和平坦底的鞋子在治疗腰痛(LBP)患者方面的效果。
在过去的十年中,持续的广告宣传声称,具有弧形鞋底的鞋子可以减轻 LBP。然而,没有确凿的证据支持这些说法。
115 名慢性 LBP 患者被随机分配穿弧形底鞋或平底鞋,每天至少站立和行走 2 小时。主要结果是 Roland Morris 残疾问卷(RMDQ)。此外,参与者每周参加一次锻炼和教育计划,为期 4 周,并在这些课程中穿着他们指定的鞋子。参与者在预先随机分组之前不知道分组情况,在 6 周、6 个月和 1 年(主要结果点)进行评估。分析采用意向治疗方法。
在 12 个月时,58 名参与者中有 44 名(77.2%)和 57 名中的 49 名(84.5%)分别归入弧形底鞋组和平底鞋组,可供分析。在弧形底鞋组中,RMDQ 平均下降 3.1(95%CI[置信区间],-4.5 至-1.6),在平底鞋组中,下降 4.4(95%CI,-5.8 至-3.1)(负值越大表示残疾程度越低)。在 6 个月时,与穿弧形底鞋的人相比,穿平底鞋的人在残疾方面有更小的临床意义的改善(分别为 53.2%和 31.1%;P=0.03)。在任何时候,RMDQ 或任何次要结局(如疼痛)的组间差异均无统计学意义。在基线时报告站立和行走时疼痛的 59 名患者(n=59)在平底鞋组中报告 RMDQ 在 12 个月时的降幅更大(-4.4[95%CI,-6.0 至-2.8],n=29),而在弧形底鞋组中降幅较小(-2.0[95%CI,-3.6 至-0.4],n=30)(P<0.05)。
在影响慢性 LBP 患者的残疾和疼痛结局方面,弧形底鞋似乎并不比平底鞋更有效。平底鞋对因站立或行走而加重的 LBP 更有益。
N/A。