Suppr超能文献

巴西耳鼻喉科医生的理论知识和科学实践分析。

Analysis of theoretical knowledge and the practice of science among Brazilian otorhinolaryngologists.

机构信息

Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia, Santa Izabel Hospital.

出版信息

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Aug;79(4):487-93. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130087.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Physicians from all medical specialties are required to understand the principles of science and to interpret medical literature. Yet, the levels of theoretical and practical knowledge held by Brazilian otorhinolaryngologists has not been evaluated to date.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the background and level of scientific knowledge of Brazilian otorhinolaryngologists.

METHOD

Participants of two national ENT meetings were invited to answer a questionnaire to assess scientific practice and knowledge.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This study included 73 medical doctors (52% otorhinolaryngologists and 38% residents) aged between 18 and 65 years. About two-thirds have been involved in some form of scientific activity during undergraduate education and/or reported to have written at least one scientific paper. Physicians who took part in research projects felt better prepared to interpret scientific papers and carry out research projects (p = 0.0103 and p = 0.0240, respectively). Respondents who claimed to have participated in research or to have written papers had higher scores on theoretical scientific concepts (p = 0.0101 and p = 0.0103, respectively). However, the overall rate of right answers on questions regarding scientific knowledge was 46.1%. Therefore, a deficiency was observed in the scientific education of Brazilian otorhinolaryngologists. Such deficiency may be mitigated through participation in research.

摘要

背景

所有医学专业的医生都必须了解科学原理并能够解读医学文献。然而,巴西耳鼻喉科医生的理论和实践知识水平尚未得到评估。

目的

评估巴西耳鼻喉科医生的背景和科学知识水平。

方法

邀请两位全国耳鼻喉科会议的参会者回答问卷,以评估他们的科学实践和知识。

结果

本研究共纳入 73 名医生(52%为耳鼻喉科医生,38%为住院医师),年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间。约三分之二的人在本科教育期间参与过某种形式的科学活动,或报告至少撰写过一篇科学论文。参与研究项目的医生表示,他们更有能力解读科学论文和开展研究项目(p = 0.0103 和 p = 0.0240)。自称参与过研究或撰写过论文的受访者在理论科学概念方面的得分更高(p = 0.0101 和 p = 0.0103)。然而,在科学知识问题上的正确答案总体比例仅为 46.1%。

结论

巴西耳鼻喉科医生的科学教育存在缺陷。通过参与研究可以减轻这种缺陷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ff5/9442442/a5ff5ed8764f/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验