• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C-QUALITY:意大利重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁药物的成本与生活质量药物经济学分析。

C-QUALITY: cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants in major depressive disorder in Italy.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2013 Jul;30(7):697-712. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0046-z. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-013-0046-z
PMID:23929174
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and disabling condition across the world. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are the most commonly used antidepressants. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness [€ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)] of all SSRIs and all SNRIs for the treatment of MDD in Italy.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits agency model to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of MDD in the largest Italian regions. This adaptation was possible thanks to the collaboration of an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The model evaluated patients with a first diagnosis of MDD and initiating an SSRI or an SNRI for the first time. The time horizon was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the model were retrieved from the literature and validated by the expert panel. Local data were considered for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on each regional health service perspective. Population-weighted regional data were used to define a national model. Scenario simulations, one-way sensitivity analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The base case analysis showed that escitalopram was associated with a lower total cost (€ 1,562) and a larger health gain (QALYs) at 1 year (0.732) per patient and dominated the other treatment strategies since more QALYs were achieved at a lower total cost. Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that escitalopram is the most cost-effective pharmacological treatment strategy for the Italian health service compared with other SSRIs and all SNRIs used in the first-line treatment of MDD.

摘要

简介

重度抑郁症(MDD)是全球常见且致残的疾病。选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)是最常用的抗抑郁药。本研究旨在评估所有 SSRIs 和所有 SNRIs 治疗意大利 MDD 的成本效益[每质量调整生命年(QALY)的欧元(€)]。

方法

从瑞典牙科和制药福利机构的模型中改编了一个决策分析模型,以反映意大利最大地区治疗 MDD 中的当前临床实践。由于意大利精神病学家和卫生经济学家专家小组的合作,这种改编成为可能。该模型评估了首次诊断为 MDD 并首次开始使用 SSRIs 或 SNRIs 的患者。时间范围为 12 个月。模型的疗效和效用数据来自文献,并由专家小组验证。资源利用和基于每个区域卫生服务视角的治疗成本考虑了当地数据。使用加权人群的区域数据定义了全国模型。进行了情景模拟、单因素敏感性分析和蒙特卡罗模拟,以测试模型的稳健性。

结果

基础情况分析表明,依他普仑的总成本(€1562)较低,且 1 年内的健康收益(QALY)较大(每位患者 0.732),与其他治疗策略相比具有优势,因为总成本较低但能获得更多的 QALY。敏感性分析支持模型的稳健性。

结论

结果表明,与用于 MDD 一线治疗的其他 SSRIs 和所有 SNRIs 相比,依他普仑是意大利卫生服务最具成本效益的药物治疗策略。

相似文献

1
C-QUALITY: cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants in major depressive disorder in Italy.C-QUALITY:意大利重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁药物的成本与生活质量药物经济学分析。
Adv Ther. 2013 Jul;30(7):697-712. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0046-z. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
2
C-QUALITY: cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants used in major depressive disorder in the regional Italian settings of Veneto and Sardinia.C-QUALITY:意大利威尼托和撒丁岛地区用于治疗重度抑郁症的抗抑郁药物的成本与生活质量药物经济学分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec 3;5:611-21. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S52063. eCollection 2013.
3
A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.急性重度抑郁症(MDD)的多国药物经济学评估:文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的成本效益比较
Value Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):16-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x.
4
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of escitalopram in major depressive disorder in Italy.艾司西酞普兰治疗意大利重度抑郁症的成本效益评估。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:87-99. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S39492. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Economic impact of therapeutic substitution of a brand selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with an alternative generic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in patients with major depressive disorder.治疗性替代品牌选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与替代通用选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的经济影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;45(4):441-51. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P482. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
6
Cost effectiveness of escitalopram versus SNRIs in second-step treatment of major depressive disorder in Sweden.在瑞典,用于重度抑郁症二步治疗中,艾司西酞普兰相较于 SNRIs 的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2010;13(3):516-26. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.506371.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmaceutical treatment options in the first-line management of major depressive disorder in Belgium.比利时重度抑郁症一线治疗中药物治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 May;32(5):479-93. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0138-x.
8
Developing thai economic model to study cost-effectiveness of switching to bupropion compared to combination with bupropion after the failure of an SSRI for major depressive disorder.建立泰国经济模型,以研究在使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗重度抑郁症失败后,改用安非他酮与联用安非他酮相比的成本效益。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Nov;93 Suppl 6:S35-42.
9
Escitalopram and duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a pharmacoeconomic comparison using UK cost data.艾司西酞普兰和度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:一项使用英国成本数据的药物经济学比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(11):969-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00008.
10
When is pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant response ready for the clinic? A cost-effectiveness analysis based on data from the STAR*D study.抗抑郁反应的药物遗传学检测何时可应用于临床?基于STAR*D研究数据的成本效益分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Sep;34(10):2227-36. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.50. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Treatments for Depression: A Systematic Literature Review.基于模型的抑郁症治疗经济评估:系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Sep;1(3):149-165. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0014-7.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of rFSH + rLH for the treatment of anovulation in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂联合重组卵泡刺激素治疗低促性腺激素性性腺功能减退症女性排卵障碍的成本效果分析。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014 Jun 25;10:479-84. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S62351. eCollection 2014.