College of Dentistry, University of Florida, 1395 Center Drive, D9-26, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2013 Aug;77(8):998-1005.
Valid and reliable instruments to measure and assess cultural competence for oral health care providers are scarce in the literature, and most published scales have been contested due to a lack of item analysis and internal estimates of reliability. The purposes of this study were, first, to develop a standardized instrument to measure dental students' knowledge of diversity, skills in culturally competent patient-centered communication, and use of culture-centered practices in patient care and, second, to provide preliminary validity support for this instrument. The initial instrument used in this study was a thirty-six-item Likert-scale survey entitled the Knowledge, Efficacy, and Practices Instrument for Oral Health Providers (KEPI-OHP). This instrument is an adaption of an initially thirty-three-item version of the Multicultural Awareness, Knowledge, and Skills Scale-Counselor Edition (MAKSS-CE), a scale that assesses factors related to social justice, cultural differences among clients, and cross-cultural client management. After the authors conducted cognitive and expert interviews, focus groups, pilot testing, and item analysis, their initial instrument was reduced to twenty-eight items. The KEPI-OHP was then distributed to 916 dental students (response rate=48.6 percent) across the United States to measure its reliability and assess its validity. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test the scale's validity. The modification of the survey into a sensible instrument with a relatively clear factor structure using factor analysis resulted in twenty items. A scree test suggested three expressive factors, which were retained for rotation. Bentler's comparative fit and Bentler and Bonnett's non-normed indices were 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. A three-factor solution, including efficacy of assessment, knowledge of diversity, and culture-centered practice subscales, comprised of twenty-items was identified. The KEPI-OHP was found to have reasonable internal consistency reliability to warrant its use for baseline and repeated measures in assessing changes in dental students' growth in cultural competence across four-year dental curricula.
用于测量和评估口腔卫生保健提供者文化能力的有效且可靠的工具在文献中十分匮乏,而且由于缺乏项目分析和内部可靠性估计,大多数已发表的量表都存在争议。本研究的目的首先是开发一种标准化工具,以衡量牙科学生对多样性的了解、在以患者为中心的文化能力沟通方面的技能,以及在患者护理中使用以文化为中心的实践;其次,为该工具提供初步的有效性支持。本研究中使用的初始工具是一项由 36 个项目组成的李克特量表调查,题为口腔卫生提供者知识、效能和实践工具(KEPI-OHP)。该工具是最初的 33 项多文化意识、知识和技能量表-辅导员版(MAKSS-CE)的改编版,该量表评估与社会正义、客户之间的文化差异和跨文化客户管理相关的因素。在作者进行认知和专家访谈、焦点小组、试点测试和项目分析后,他们的初始工具减少到 28 个项目。然后,KEPI-OHP 分发给美国各地的 916 名牙科学生(回复率为 48.6%),以衡量其可靠性并评估其有效性。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析,以检验该量表的有效性。使用因子分析对调查进行修改,使其成为具有相对清晰因子结构的合理工具,结果得到 20 个项目。碎图测试提示有三个表达因子,保留进行旋转。Bentler 的比较拟合和 Bentler 和 Bonnett 的非标准化指数分别为 0.95 和 0.92。确定了一个由 20 个项目组成的三因子解决方案,包括评估效能、多样性知识和以文化为中心的实践子量表。KEPI-OHP 被发现具有合理的内部一致性可靠性,可用于评估牙科学生在四年牙科课程中文化能力增长的基线和重复测量。