H.P. French, PhD, MSc(Physio), BPhysio, DipStat, MISCP, School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.
Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;94(1):31-9. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130173. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
Physical therapy for hip osteoarthritis (OA) has shown short-term effects but limited long-term benefit. There has been limited research, with inconsistent results, in identifying prognostic factors associated with a positive response to physical therapy.
The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of response to physical therapy (exercise therapy [ET] with or without adjunctive manual therapy [MT]) for hip OA based on baseline patient-specific and clinical characteristics.
A prognostic study was conducted.
Secondary analysis of data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) (N=131) that evaluated the effectiveness of ET and ET+MT for hip OA was undertaken. Treatment response was defined using OMERACT/OARSI responder criteria. Ten baseline measures were used as predictor variables. Regression analyses were undertaken to identify predictors of outcome. Discriminative ability (sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios) of significant variables was calculated.
The RCT results showed no significant difference in most outcomes between ET and ET+MT at 9 and 18 weeks posttreatment. Forty-six patients were classified as responders at 9 weeks, and 36 patients were classified as responders at 18 weeks. Four baseline variables were predictive of a positive outcome at 9 weeks: male sex, pain with activity (<6/10), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function subscale score (<34/68), and psychological health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score <9/42). No predictor variables were identified at the 18-week follow-up. Prognostic accuracy was fair for all 4 variables (sensitivity=0.5-0.58, specificity=0.57-0.72, likelihood ratios=1.25-1.77), indicating fair discriminative ability at predicting treatment response.
The short-term follow-up limits the interpretation of results, and the low number of identified responders may have resulted in possible overfitting of the predictor model.
The authors were unable to identify baseline variables in patients with hip OA that indicate those most likely to respond to treatment due to low discriminative ability. Further validation studies are needed to definitively define the best predictors of response to physical therapy in people with hip OA.
物理治疗髋关节骨关节炎(OA)显示出短期效果,但长期益处有限。在确定与物理治疗(运动治疗[ET]加或不加辅助手法治疗[MT])反应相关的预后因素方面,研究有限,结果不一致。
本研究旨在根据基线患者特定和临床特征,确定髋关节 OA 接受物理治疗(ET 加或不加辅助 MT)反应的潜在预测因素。
进行了一项预后研究。
对多中心随机对照试验(RCT)(N=131)的数据进行二次分析,该 RCT 评估了 ET 和 ET+MT 治疗髋关节 OA 的有效性。治疗反应采用 OMERACT/OARSI 反应标准定义。使用 10 项基线测量作为预测变量。进行回归分析以确定结果的预测因素。计算显著变量的鉴别能力(敏感性、特异性和似然比)。
RCT 结果显示,在治疗后 9 周和 18 周时,ET 和 ET+MT 在大多数结局上无显著差异。9 周时,46 名患者被归类为反应者,18 周时,36 名患者被归类为反应者。四个基线变量可预测 9 周时的阳性结局:男性、活动时疼痛(<6/10)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数身体功能子量表评分(<34/68)和心理健康(医院焦虑和抑郁量表评分<9/42)。在 18 周随访时,没有预测变量。所有 4 个变量的预后准确性均为中等(敏感性=0.5-0.58,特异性=0.57-0.72,似然比=1.25-1.77),表明在预测治疗反应方面具有中等的鉴别能力。
短期随访限制了结果的解释,识别出的反应者数量较少可能导致预测模型的过度拟合。
作者无法确定髋关节 OA 患者的基线变量,这些变量表明最有可能对治疗有反应,因为鉴别能力较低。需要进一步的验证研究来明确确定髋关节 OA 患者对物理治疗反应的最佳预测因素。