Razavizade Mohsen, Jamali Raika, Arj Abbas, Matini Seyyed Mohammad, Moraveji Alireza, Taherkhani Effat
Internal Medicine Ward, Shahid Beheshti Kashan Hospital, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IR Iran.
Hepat Mon. 2013 May 21;13(5):e9270. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.9270. Print 2013 May.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered as the hepatic manifestation of insulin resistance (IR) syndrome. The effect of insulin sensitizers on liver function tests and metabolic indices in NAFLD patients is a matter of debate.
The aim of study was to compare the effects of two different insulin sensitizers, pioglitazone, and metformin, on liver function tests (LFT), lipid profile, homeostasis model assessment-IR (HOMA-IR) index, and liver fat content (LFC) in NAFLD patients.
This double blind clinical trial was performed on patients who were referred to a gastroenterology clinic with evidence of fatty liver in ultrasonography. After excluding other causes, participants with persistent elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and "NAFLD liver fat score" greater than -0.64 were presumed to have NAFLD and were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to take metformin (1 g/day) or pioglitazone (30 mg/day) for four months. Fasting serum glucose (FSG), ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), triglyceride, cholesterol (CHOL), high and low density lipoprotein (HDL, LDL), HOMA-IR, and LFC were checked at the baseline, two and four months post-treatment. LFC was measured by a validated formula.
Eighty patients (68 males) with mean age of 35.27 (± 7.98) were included. After 2 months, LFT was improved significantly in the pioglitazone group and did not change in the metformin group. After four months, both medications significantly decreased serum levels of LFT, FSG, CHOL, LDL, HOMA-IR, and LFC, and increased serum level of HDL. No statistically significant differences were seen between the two treatment groups with regard to the changes of laboratory parameters and LFC from baseline to four months post-treatment.
During the four months, the use of metformin (1 g/day) and pioglitazone (30 mg/day) were safe and might have equally affected LFT, HOMA-IR, lipid profile, and LFC in NAFLD patients.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)被认为是胰岛素抵抗(IR)综合征的肝脏表现。胰岛素增敏剂对NAFLD患者肝功能检查和代谢指标的影响存在争议。
本研究旨在比较两种不同的胰岛素增敏剂,即吡格列酮和二甲双胍,对NAFLD患者肝功能检查(LFT)、血脂谱、稳态模型评估-胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)指数和肝脏脂肪含量(LFC)的影响。
本双盲临床试验对超声检查有脂肪肝证据并转诊至胃肠病诊所的患者进行。排除其他病因后,丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平持续升高且“NAFLD肝脏脂肪评分”大于-0.64的参与者被认定为患有NAFLD并纳入研究。他们被随机分配服用二甲双胍(1克/天)或吡格列酮(30毫克/天),为期四个月。在基线、治疗后两个月和四个月时检查空腹血糖(FSG)、ALT、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、甘油三酯、胆固醇(CHOL)、高密度脂蛋白和低密度脂蛋白(HDL、LDL)、HOMA-IR和LFC。LFC通过一个经过验证的公式测量。
纳入了80名患者(68名男性),平均年龄为35.27(±7.98)岁。两个月后,吡格列酮组的LFT显著改善,而二甲双胍组未变化。四个月后,两种药物均显著降低了LFT、FSG、CHOL、LDL、HOMA-IR和LFC的血清水平,并提高了HDL的血清水平。从基线到治疗后四个月,两个治疗组在实验室参数和LFC变化方面未见统计学显著差异。
在四个月期间,服用二甲双胍(1克/天)和吡格列酮(30毫克/天)是安全的,并且可能对NAFLD患者的LFT、HOMA-IR、血脂谱和LFC产生同等影响。