Baicker Katherine, Mullainathan Sendhil, Schwartzstein Joshua
Harvard University
Harvard Business School
Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health. 2013(1):2-3.
A fundamental implication of standard moral hazard models is overuse of low-value medical care because copays are lower than costs. In these models, the demand curve alone can be used to make welfare statements, a fact relied on by much empirical work. There is ample evidence, though, that people misuse care for a different reason: mistakes, or “behavioral hazard.” Much high-value care is underused even when patient costs are low, and some useless care is bought even when patients face the full cost. In the presence of behavioral hazard, welfare calculations using only the demand curve can be off by orders of magnitude or even be the wrong sign. We derive optimal copay formulas that incorporate both moral and behavioral hazard, providing a theoretical foundation for value-based insurance design and a way to interpret behavioral “nudges.” Once behavioral hazard is taken into account, health insurance can do more than just provide financial protection—it can also improve health care efficiency.
标准道德风险模型的一个基本含义是低价值医疗服务的过度使用,因为自付费用低于成本。在这些模型中,仅需求曲线就可用于进行福利陈述,这一事实被许多实证研究所依赖。然而,有充分的证据表明,人们因另一个原因而滥用医疗服务:失误,即“行为风险”。即使患者成本较低,许多高价值医疗服务仍未得到充分利用,而即使患者承担全部成本,仍会购买一些无用的医疗服务。在存在行为风险的情况下,仅使用需求曲线进行的福利计算可能会相差几个数量级,甚至符号错误。我们推导出了结合道德风险和行为风险的最优自付费用公式,为基于价值的保险设计提供了理论基础,并提供了一种解释行为“助推”的方法。一旦考虑到行为风险,医疗保险就不仅仅能提供财务保护,还能提高医疗保健效率。