• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于左截断导致的队列研究中的选择偏差导致的准确性损失。

Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20854, USA.

出版信息

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;27(5):491-502. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12073.

DOI:10.1111/ppe.12073
PMID:23930785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6151356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selection is a common problem in paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, and truncation can be thought of as missing person time that can result in selection bias. Left truncation, also known as late or staggered entry, may induce selection bias and/or adversely affect precision. There are two kinds of left truncation: fixed left truncation where the start of follow-up is initiated at a set time, and variable left truncation where follow-up begins at a stochastically varying time-point.

METHODS

Using data from a time-to-pregnancy study, augmented by a simulation study, we demonstrate the effects of fixed and variable truncation on estimates of the hazard ratio.

RESULTS

First, fixed or variable non-differential left truncation results in a loss of precision. Fixed or variable differential left truncation results in a bias either towards or away from the null as well as a loss of precision. The extent and direction of this bias is a function of the size and direction of the association between exposure and outcome, and occurs in common scenarios and under a wide range of conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated in simulation studies, selection bias due to left truncation could have a serious impact on inferences, especially in the case of fixed or variable differential left truncation. When present in epidemiologic studies, proper accounting for left truncation is just as important as proper accounting for right censoring.

摘要

背景

选择是儿科和围产流行病学中的常见问题,截尾可以被视为缺失的个体时间,可能导致选择偏倚。左截断,也称为晚期或交错进入,可能会引起选择偏差和/或对精度产生不利影响。左截断有两种类型:固定左截断,其中随访的开始时间设定在一个固定的时间;和可变左截断,其中随访开始时间是随机变化的。

方法

使用来自妊娠时间研究的数据,并通过模拟研究进行扩充,我们展示了固定和可变截断对危险比估计的影响。

结果

首先,固定或可变的非差异左截断会导致精度损失。固定或可变的差异左截断会导致向零值或远离零值的偏差,以及精度损失。这种偏差的程度和方向是暴露与结局之间关联的大小和方向的函数,在常见的情况下和广泛的条件下都会发生。

结论

正如模拟研究所示,由于左截断引起的选择偏差可能对推断产生严重影响,特别是在固定或可变的差异左截断的情况下。在流行病学研究中,正确处理左截断和正确处理右删失一样重要。

相似文献

1
Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.由于左截断导致的队列研究中的选择偏差导致的准确性损失。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;27(5):491-502. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12073.
2
Selection Biases in Perinatal Research: A Comparison of Inverse Probability Weighting, Instrumental Variable and Sibling-Comparison Design.围产期研究中的选择偏倚:逆概率加权、工具变量和同胞比较设计的比较
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1111/ppe.70021.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Left truncation results in substantial bias of the relation between time-dependent exposures and adverse events.左截断会导致与时间依赖性暴露和不良事件之间的关系产生实质性的偏差。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Left truncation in linked data: A practical guide to understanding left truncation and applying it using SAS and R.关联数据中的左截断:理解左截断并使用SAS和R进行应用的实用指南。
Pharm Stat. 2023 Jan;22(1):194-204. doi: 10.1002/pst.2257. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
6
Left truncation, susceptibility, and bias in occupational cohort studies.职业队列研究中的左截断、易感性和偏差。
Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):599-606. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821d0879.
7
The implications of outcome truncation in reproductive medicine RCTs: a simulation platform for trialists and simulation study.生殖医学 RCT 中结局截尾的影响:试验者模拟平台和模拟研究。
Trials. 2021 Aug 6;22(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05482-4.
8
Conditions for bias from differential left truncation.差异左截断导致偏差的条件。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb 15;165(4):444-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk027. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
9
Systematic exclusion at study commencement masks earlier menopause for Black women in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).在全国妇女健康研究(SWAN)中,系统地在研究开始时排除黑人女性,掩盖了她们更早的绝经期。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 5;52(5):1612-1623. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad085.
10
Left Truncation Bias to Explain the Protective Effect of Smoking on Preeclampsia: Potential, But How Plausible?用左截断偏差解释吸烟对先兆子痫的保护作用:有可能性,但可信度如何?
Epidemiology. 2017 May;28(3):428-434. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000632.

引用本文的文献

1
Fecundability in Association With Everyday and Lifetime Discrimination.与日常及终身歧视相关的受孕能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2520597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.20597.
2
A prospective study of semen quality and fecundability among North American couples planning pregnancy.一项针对北美计划怀孕夫妇精液质量和受孕能力的前瞻性研究。
Andrology. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1111/andr.70084.
3
Placental Abruption and Perinatal Mortality: Abnormal Placentation and Spontaneous Abortion as Contributors to Left Truncation Bias.胎盘早剥与围产期死亡率:异常胎盘形成及自然流产作为左截断偏倚的影响因素
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1111/ppe.70010.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
5
The Same but Different?: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Selection and Collider Bias on Internal Validity.相同却又不同?:对选择偏倚和对撞机偏倚对内部效度影响的系统评价
Epidemiology. 2025 Jul 1;36(4):473-481. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001864. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
6
The association between sleep and fecundability: a Danish preconception cohort study.睡眠与受孕能力之间的关联:一项丹麦孕前队列研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;35(3):512-520. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf039.
7
Does Adjusting for Causal Intermediate Confounders Resolve the Perinatal Crossover Paradox?对因果中间混杂因素进行调整能否解决围产期交叉悖论?
Epidemiology. 2025 May 1;36(3):350-362. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001848. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study.预选择对肉种鸡群体偏差水平和准确性的影响:一项模拟研究
J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jul;142(4):392-407. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12908. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
9
Female sexual function and distress and time-to-pregnancy in a prospective preconception cohort.一项前瞻性孕前队列研究中的女性性功能、困扰与受孕时间
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;232(4):375.e1-375.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.117. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
10
Childhood adversity and time to pregnancy in a preconception cohort.儿童逆境与受孕时间:一项孕前队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Nov 4;193(11):1553-1563. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae085.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing prospective cohort studies for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicity during sensitive windows of human reproduction and development--the LIFE Study.设计前瞻性队列研究以评估人类生殖发育敏感窗口期间的生殖和发育毒性--LIFE 研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;25(5):413-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01205.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
2
Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider.图示由于在共因上进行条件推断而产生的偏差。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):417-20. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp334. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
3
Statistical methods for estimating the probability of spontaneous abortion in observational studies--analyzing pregnancies exposed to coumarin derivatives.观察性研究中估计自然流产概率的统计方法——分析暴露于香豆素衍生物的妊娠情况
Reprod Toxicol. 2008 Sep;26(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
4
Properties of 2 counterfactual effect definitions of a point exposure.点暴露的两种反事实效应定义的属性。
Epidemiology. 2007 Jul;18(4):453-60. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000261472.07150.4f.
5
Reducing healthy worker survivor bias by restricting date of hire in a cohort study of Vermont granite workers.在佛蒙特州花岗岩工人队列研究中,通过限制雇佣日期来减少健康工人幸存者偏差。
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Oct;64(10):681-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.031369. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
6
Conditions for bias from differential left truncation.差异左截断导致偏差的条件。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb 15;165(4):444-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk027. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
7
Misclassification of gestational age in the study of spontaneous abortion.自然流产研究中孕周的错误分类。
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec 1;164(11):1126-36. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj327. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
8
Accounting for leadtime in cohort studies: evaluating when to initiate HIV therapies.队列研究中的提前期考量:评估开始抗逆转录病毒疗法的时机。
Stat Med. 2004 Nov 15;23(21):3351-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.1579.
9
A structural approach to selection bias.一种针对选择偏倚的结构化方法。
Epidemiology. 2004 Sep;15(5):615-25. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43.
10
Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs.评估临床试验之外的药物疗效:新用户设计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Nov 1;158(9):915-20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg231.