Watteyn Anneleen, Russo Elisa, Garmyn An, De Baere Siegrid, Pasmans Frank, Martel An, Haesebrouck Freddy, Montesissa Clara, De Backer Patrick, Croubels Siska
a Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Ghent University , Merelbeke , Belgium.
Avian Pathol. 2013;42(5):474-81. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2013.823144. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
In poultry rearing, medicated drinking water is a commonly used administration route, but drug uptake can be affected by many factors. In this study, the influence of two important parameters, the photoperiod and feeding schemes, on florfenicol uptake in turkeys was tested. First, the uptake was determined as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of florfenicol; and second, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of florfenicol against Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale. Both experiments were conducted during a 5-day treatment of 30 mg/kg body weight florfenicol administered via drinking water and considering different photoperiods and feeding schemes (group 20/4L: photoperiod of 20 h, fed ad libitum; group 16/8L: photoperiod of 16 h, fed ad libitum; group 16/8R: photoperiod of 16 h, fed ad libitum but feed was withdrawn during the dark period and replaced 1 h after lighting). On day 1 of treatment, all groups showed plasma concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (both MIC50 and MIC90, 1 mg/l) of 37.7%, 63.5% and 53.1% of a 24-h interval for 20/4L, 16/8L and 16/8R, respectively. Only in the 16/8L and 16/8R groups was the MIC also exceeded on day 5 (47.9% and 21.5% of a 24-h interval, respectively). In all groups, a clinical improvement could be noticed, resulting in reduction of the clinical score. However, only the 16/8L and 16/8R groups showed significant differences from the control group. The results demonstrated an important influence of the photoperiod on the pharmacokinetics of florfenicol as well as the clinical outcome in an infection model. It can be advised that the photoperiod should be <20 h to have sufficient drug intake. Nevertheless, there was no effect between fed and fasted turkeys for both the pharmacokinetics and the clinical outcome.
在家禽养殖中,加药饮水是一种常用的给药途径,但药物吸收会受到多种因素影响。在本研究中,测试了两个重要参数——光照周期和饲喂方案对火鸡氟苯尼考吸收的影响。首先,将吸收情况确定为氟苯尼考的药代动力学/药效学特征;其次,评估了氟苯尼考对鼻气管鸟杆菌的临床疗效。两项实验均在通过饮水给予30mg/kg体重氟苯尼考的5天治疗期间进行,并考虑不同的光照周期和饲喂方案(20/4L组:光照周期20小时,自由采食;16/8L组:光照周期16小时,自由采食;16/8R组:光照周期16小时,自由采食,但在黑暗期撤掉饲料,光照后1小时重新投喂)。在治疗第1天,所有组在24小时内血浆浓度高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC50和MIC90均为1mg/l)的比例,20/4L组、16/8L组和16/8R组分别为37.7%、63.5%和53.1%。仅在16/8L组和16/8R组中,第5天也超过了MIC(分别为24小时内的47.9%和21.5%)。在所有组中,均可观察到临床症状改善,临床评分降低。然而,只有16/8L组和16/8R组与对照组存在显著差异。结果表明,光照周期对氟苯尼考药代动力学以及感染模型中的临床结果有重要影响。建议光照周期应<20小时以确保有足够的药物摄入。然而,对于药代动力学和临床结果而言,采食和禁食的火鸡之间没有差异。