• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中度风险患者的 GnRH 激动剂 IVF 周期中预防卵巢过度刺激综合征:比较羟乙基淀粉与卡麦角林和羟乙基淀粉的随机研究。

Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH agonist IVF cycles in moderate risk patients: randomized study comparing hydroxyethyl starch versus cabergoline and hydroxyethyl starch.

机构信息

Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cruces University Hospital, Vizcaya, Spain; School of Medicine, Basque Country University, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.010
PMID:23932181
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether, in GnRH agonist IVF cycles where there is a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), the addition of cabergoline to the hydroxyethyl starch (HES) infusion could decrease OHSS incidence and severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective randomized study. The population under study consisted of women undergoing IVF cycles with GnRH agonist protocols, at risk of OHSS (more than 20 follicles observed larger than 12 mm in diameter and/or estradiol levels of 3000-5000 pg/mL). Women received a slow infusion of 500 mL of 6% HES during follicular aspiration alone or combined with 0.5mg cabergoline administration for 8 days, starting on the day of hCG administration.

RESULTS

The rates of OHSS (both early and late) were very similar in the HES alone group (3.19% (3/94)) and in the HES plus cabergoline group (5.68% (5/88)), as were the rates of severe cases of OHSS (1.06% and 2.27%). Pregnancy rates (PR) were also similar in the two groups (ongoing PR per transfer, 47.56% and 47.50%).

COMMENTS

The co-administration of cabergoline in patients receiving HES due to OHSS risk did not reduce the rate or severity of OHSS in GnRH agonist IVF cycles.

摘要

目的

评估在 GnRH 激动剂 IVF 周期中存在卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)风险的情况下,向羟乙基淀粉(HES)输注中添加卡麦角林是否可以降低 OHSS 的发生率和严重程度。

材料和方法

前瞻性随机研究。研究人群由接受 GnRH 激动剂方案 IVF 周期的妇女组成,这些妇女有发生 OHSS 的风险(观察到超过 20 个卵泡直径大于 12 毫米和/或雌二醇水平为 3000-5000pg/mL)。妇女在卵泡抽吸时单独接受 500 毫升 6% HES 的缓慢输注,或在 hCG 给药当天开始连续 8 天接受 0.5mg 卡麦角林给药,联合 HES 输注。

结果

HES 单独组(3.19%(3/94))和 HES 加卡麦角林组(5.68%(5/88))的 OHSS(早期和晚期)发生率非常相似,严重 OHSS 的发生率也相似(1.06%和 2.27%)。两组的妊娠率(PR)也相似(每转移的持续妊娠率,47.56%和 47.50%)。

评论

在 GnRH 激动剂 IVF 周期中,由于 OHSS 风险而接受 HES 治疗的患者联合使用卡麦角林并未降低 OHSS 的发生率或严重程度。

相似文献

1
Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH agonist IVF cycles in moderate risk patients: randomized study comparing hydroxyethyl starch versus cabergoline and hydroxyethyl starch.在中度风险患者的 GnRH 激动剂 IVF 周期中预防卵巢过度刺激综合征:比较羟乙基淀粉与卡麦角林和羟乙基淀粉的随机研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
2
Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: cabergoline versus coasting.预防卵巢过度刺激综合征:卡麦角林与 coasting。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;288(5):1159-63. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2875-z. Epub 2013 May 16.
3
Vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist reduces the early onset and the severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.血管内皮生长因子拮抗剂可降低卵巢过度刺激综合征的早期发病及严重程度。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;46(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.用于预防卵巢过度刺激综合征的多巴胺激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub3.
5
Consistent high clinical pregnancy rates and low ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates in high-risk patients after GnRH agonist triggering and modified luteal support: a retrospective multicentre study.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂扳机后改良黄体支持在高风险患者中可获得一致的高临床妊娠率和低卵巢过度刺激综合征率:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2529-36. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det304. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
6
Volume expanders for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.用于预防卵巢过度刺激综合征的扩容剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD001302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001302.pub3.
7
Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.卵巢过度刺激综合征高危患者辅助生殖周期中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与拮抗剂的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2005 Sep;20(9):2421-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei074. Epub 2005 May 12.
8
Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.多巴胺激动剂预防卵巢过度刺激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 14;4(4):CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub4.
9
Current Medical Strategies in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.预防卵巢过度刺激综合征的当前医学策略
Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Mar;56(1):133-142. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.01.19.
10
GnRH antagonist rescue protocol combined with cabergoline versus cabergoline alone in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂挽救方案联合卡麦角林与单用卡麦角林预防卵巢过度刺激综合征:一项随机对照试验
J Ovarian Res. 2016 May 17;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13048-016-0237-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cabergoline Use and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.卡麦角林的使用与妊娠结局:一项系统评价。
Birth Defects Res. 2025 Mar;117(3):e2464. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2464.
2
Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.多巴胺激动剂预防卵巢过度刺激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 14;4(4):CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub4.
3
Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.用于预防卵巢过度刺激综合征的多巴胺激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub3.
4
Volume expanders for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.用于预防卵巢过度刺激综合征的扩容剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD001302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001302.pub3.
5
Pharmacologic Interventions in Preventing Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.预防卵巢过度刺激综合征的药物干预:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 11;6:19093. doi: 10.1038/srep19093.