Tamura Akira, Ishii Jun, Katagiri Toshio, Maeda Tetsuya, Kubota Yoshihisa, Kaneko Hironori
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Sep;60(126):1280-3. doi: 10.5754/hge13094.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We analyzed perioperative and long-term postoperative data to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC).
89 LSCs done at our center were classified into 3 groups according to the operative procedure required to treat severe cholecystitis. Perioperative and long-term postoperative results were then compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (s-LC).
Operative time was longer and postoperative CRP level was higher for LSC. Significantly more bleeding and longer operative times were seen only in the LSC-II subgroup, and average postoperative hospital stay was longer only in the LSC-III subgroup. As for long-term (1.5 to 8 years) postoperative results, 3 of 26 LSC-III cases had a relapse of cholecystolithiasis in remnant gallbladder tissue 2 years or later after initial surgery.
There were no serious intraoperative complications such as the bile duct injury, and a smaller proportion of procedures were intraoperatively converted to open laparotomy. It is considered that LSC is a safe, useful surgical procedure to the patients in whom the neck of the gallbladder is anatomically unclear due to cholecystitis or fibrosis although patients undergoing LSC-III should be monitored for cholecystolithiasis in remnant gallbladder tissue. LSC is often the procedure of choice for patients.
背景/目的:我们分析了围手术期及术后长期数据,以确定腹腔镜次全胆囊切除术(LSC)的有效性。
根据治疗重症胆囊炎所需的手术操作,将我们中心进行的89例LSC分为3组。然后将围手术期及术后长期结果与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术(s-LC)进行比较。
LSC的手术时间更长,术后CRP水平更高。仅在LSC-II亚组中观察到明显更多的出血和更长的手术时间,仅在LSC-III亚组中术后平均住院时间更长。至于术后长期(1.5至8年)结果,26例LSC-III病例中有3例在初次手术后2年或更晚出现残余胆囊组织胆囊结石复发。
未发生诸如胆管损伤等严重术中并发症,术中转为开腹手术的比例较小。认为LSC对于因胆囊炎或纤维化导致胆囊颈部解剖结构不清的患者是一种安全、有用的手术方法,尽管LSC-III患者应监测残余胆囊组织中的胆囊结石。LSC通常是患者的首选手术方式。