• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于单髁膝关节置换的徒手塑形工具的准确性。

Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement.

作者信息

Smith Julie R, Riches Philip E, Rowe Philip J

机构信息

Centre for Robotic Orthopaedic Surgery at Strathclyde, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2014 Jun;10(2):162-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1522. Epub 2013 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.1522
PMID:23934937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unicondylar knee replacement is technically challenging and malalignment of the implant components is one of the factors that results in high failure rates. Surgical robotics with navigation is emerging as a potential solution to improve the accuracy of implant placement.

METHODS

The accuracy of performing unicondylar knee replacement using a freehand sculpting, semi-active robotic tool was investigated using 20 synthetic femurs and tibia. Resultant femoral and tibial implant placement was compared to the planned implant position.

RESULTS

The maximum rotational error was 3.2(o) and RMS angular error was 1.46(o) across all orientations, for both the tibia and femoral implants. The maximum translational error was 1.18 mm and the RMS translational error across all directions was 0.61 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The freehand sculpting tool produced accurate implant placement with small errors comparable to those reported by other robotic-assistive devices on the market for unicondylar knee replacement.

摘要

背景

单髁膝关节置换术在技术上具有挑战性,植入部件排列不齐是导致高失败率的因素之一。带有导航的手术机器人技术正在成为提高植入物放置准确性的一种潜在解决方案。

方法

使用20个合成股骨和胫骨,研究了使用徒手塑形的半主动机器人工具进行单髁膝关节置换术的准确性。将最终的股骨和胫骨植入物放置位置与计划的植入物位置进行比较。

结果

胫骨和股骨植入物在所有方向上的最大旋转误差为3.2°,均方根角误差为1.46°。最大平移误差为1.18毫米,所有方向上的均方根平移误差为0.61毫米。

结论

徒手塑形工具产生的植入物放置准确,误差小,与市场上其他用于单髁膝关节置换的机器人辅助设备所报告的误差相当。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement.一种用于单髁膝关节置换的徒手塑形工具的准确性。
Int J Med Robot. 2014 Jun;10(2):162-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1522. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
2
High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.在一项尸体研究中,新型无图像手持式机器人用于单髁膝关节置换术的高度准确性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):206-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3764-x.
3
Precision freehand sculpting for unicondylar knee replacement: design and experimental validation.单髁膝关节置换的精准徒手塑形:设计与实验验证
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2012 Feb 23;57(4):293-9. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0098.
4
Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses.股骨至胫骨内翻不匹配对单髁膝关节假体接触面积的影响。
Knee. 2010 Oct;17(5):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
5
Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.新型无图像手持机器人在尸体研究中用于全膝关节置换术的准确性评估。
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2018 Dec;23(1):14-20. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038.
6
Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system.通过现代计算机导航系统评估,全膝关节置换术中采用传统技术获得的截骨平面的对齐情况。
Int J Med Robot. 2007 Jun;3(2):117-24. doi: 10.1002/rcs.131.
7
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: robot vs. patient specific instrumentation.单髁膝关节置换术:机器人辅助与患者特异性器械
Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
Implant orientation accuracy of a hand-held robotic partial knee replacement system over conventional technique in a cadaveric test.手持机器人辅助膝关节置换术与传统技术在尸体试验中的植入物定位准确性比较。
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2018 Dec;23(1):8-13. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1484167.
9
Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:一项使用多参数定量三维CT评估对线的对照尸体研究。
Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.
10
Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool.使用手持式无图像雕刻工具的机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan;47(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: historical perspectives and current innovations.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术:历史回顾与当前创新
Biomed Eng Lett. 2023 Sep 28;13(4):543-552. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00323-6. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty-What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?计算机断层扫描在择期膝关节和髋关节置换术中的应用——它们能告诉我们什么以及有何风险?
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 5;15:132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.008. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: an evolution in progress. A concise review of the available systems and the data supporting them.
机器人辅助膝关节置换术:不断演进的技术。对现有系统及相关数据的简要综述。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2099-2117. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04134-1. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
A systematic review of imageless hand-held robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: learning curve, accuracy, functional outcome and survivorship.无影像手持式机器人辅助膝关节置换术的系统评价:学习曲线、准确性、功能结果和生存率
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 May 9;5(5):319-326. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190065. eCollection 2020 May.
5
Preliminary experience with an image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group.无图像引导的手持机器人辅助全膝关节置换术初步经验:77 例与匹配对照组比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):723-729. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
6
Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data.内侧单髁膝关节置换术中标准技术与无影像机器人技术的比较。初步数据。
Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 5;90(12-S):104-108. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8994.
7
Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.新型无图像手持机器人在尸体研究中用于全膝关节置换术的准确性评估。
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2018 Dec;23(1):14-20. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038.
8
Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术可改善植入物位置,降低翻修率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5081-5. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : Systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统单髁膝关节置换术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Orthopade. 2018 Dec;47(12):1009-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-3604-x.
10
A Robotic Flexible Drill and Its Navigation System for Total Hip Arthroplasty.一种用于全髋关节置换术的机器人柔性钻头及其导航系统。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Mar;46(3):464-474. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1959-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.