Suppr超能文献

用于外周动脉疾病的冷冻成形术。

Cryoplasty for peripheral arterial disease.

作者信息

McCaslin James E, Andras Alina, Stansby Gerard

机构信息

Northern Vascular Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK, NE7 7DN.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 11(8):CD005507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005507.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous balloon angioplasty is an endovascular technique for restoring blood flow through an artery that has become narrowed or blocked by atherosclerosis. Narrowing of the artery following angioplasty (restenosis) is the major cause of long-term failure. Cryoplasty offers a different approach to improving long-term angioplasty results. It combines the dilation force of balloon angioplasty with cooling of the vessel wall. This systematic review evaluated cryoplasty in peripheral arterial disease and provides focus for further research in the field. This is an update of a review first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of, and complications associated with, cryoplasty for maintaining patency in the iliac, femoropopliteal and crural arteries in the short and medium term.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched October 2012) and CENTRAL (2012, Issue 10). Trial databases were searched for ongoing or unpublished studies. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials in which participants with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower limbs, or lower limb bypass graft stenoses, were randomised to cryoplasty with or without another procedure versus a procedure without cryoplasty were considered. This included trials where all participants received angioplasty and the randomisation was for cryoplasty versus no cryoplasty and trials where cryoplasty was used as an adjunct to conventional treatment (for example stenting) against a control.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed, assessed and selected trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials (six primary cryoplasty and one adjunctive cryoplasty trial) with a combined total of 478 patients were included in this review. The trials reported patency and restenosis either by participant, lesion or vessel location. Follow-up ranged from 30 days to three years.Target lesion patency measured at various time points in two primary cryoplasty trials showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups. The adjunctive cryoplasty study showed that cryoplasty was associated with improved patency only at six months (OR 5.37, 95% CI 1.09 to 26.49, n = 90).Restenosis measured per patient (two primary cryoplasty trials) showed no statistically significant difference between the treatments. Restenosis measured by lesion (two primary cryoplasty trials) showed a statistically significant difference only within 24 hours of the procedure (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.18, n = 192) favouring cryoplasty.Need for re-intervention was not significantly different in primary cryoplasty trial participants (per participant: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.52, n = 241, I(2) = 89%; per lesion: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.06 to 5.69, n = 307, I(2) = 94%). The adjunctive cryoplasty trial did not report on need for intervention.Immediate success of procedure (within 24 hours) was not significantly different in primary cryoplasty trial participants (per participant: OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.14 to 19.55, n = 340, I(2) = 95%; per lesion: OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.19 to 17.36, n = 397, I(2) = 90%). The adjunctive cryoplasty trial reported 100% success.Limb loss, deaths from all causes and the risk of complications immediately after treatment showed no statistically significant differences between the treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of cryoplasty over conventional angioplasty cannot be established as the number of randomised controlled trials is small and their quality is not sufficiently high. The technical success and primary patency rates seen in these trials are inconsistent and do not necessarily suggest a future role for cryoplasty in the treatment of PAD, but they cannot be reliably interpreted. Currently there are insufficient data to support the routine use of cryoplasty over conventional balloon angioplasty in the treatment of PAD.

摘要

背景

经皮球囊血管成形术是一种血管内技术,用于恢复因动脉粥样硬化而变窄或阻塞的动脉中的血流。血管成形术后动脉狭窄(再狭窄)是导致长期治疗失败的主要原因。冷冻球囊血管成形术为改善血管成形术的长期效果提供了一种不同的方法。它将球囊血管成形术的扩张力与血管壁冷却相结合。本系统评价评估了冷冻球囊血管成形术在外周动脉疾病中的应用,并为该领域的进一步研究提供了重点。这是对2007年首次发表的一篇综述的更新。

目的

评估冷冻球囊血管成形术在短期和中期维持髂动脉、股腘动脉和小腿动脉通畅方面的疗效及相关并发症。

检索方法

为了进行本次更新,Cochrane外周血管疾病小组试验搜索协调员检索了专业注册库(最后检索时间为2012年10月)和CENTRAL(2012年第10期)。检索试验数据库以查找正在进行或未发表的研究。我们还检索了相关文章的参考文献列表。

入选标准

所有随机对照试验,其中下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者或下肢旁路移植血管狭窄患者被随机分配接受冷冻球囊血管成形术(加或不加其他手术)与不进行冷冻球囊血管成形术手术进行对比,均被纳入考虑。这包括所有参与者均接受血管成形术且随机分组为冷冻球囊血管成形术与非冷冻球囊血管成形术的试验,以及冷冻球囊血管成形术作为传统治疗(如支架置入术)辅助手段与对照组对比的试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立审查、评估并选择试验,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。

主要结果

本综述纳入了7项试验(6项主要冷冻球囊血管成形术试验和1项辅助冷冻球囊血管成形术试验),共计478例患者。试验报告了按参与者、病变或血管位置划分的通畅率和再狭窄率。随访时间从30天至3年不等。两项主要冷冻球囊血管成形术试验在不同时间点测量的目标病变通畅率显示,治疗组之间无统计学显著差异。辅助冷冻球囊血管成形术研究表明,冷冻球囊血管成形术仅在6个月时与通畅率改善相关(比值比5.37,95%置信区间1.09至26.49,n = 90)。按患者测量的再狭窄率(两项主要冷冻球囊血管成形术试验)显示,治疗组之间无统计学显著差异。按病变测量的再狭窄率(两项主要冷冻球囊血管成形术试验)仅在术后24小时内显示出统计学显著差异(比值比0.08,95%置信区间0.04至0.18,n = 192),支持冷冻球囊血管成形术。主要冷冻球囊血管成形术试验参与者再次干预的需求无显著差异(按参与者:比值比0.27,95%置信区间0.05至1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验