Shu Fan, Guo Menghe, Xie Nanping, Zhang Hongzheng, Wan Liangcai
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China.
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;27(10):455-7.
To investigate the effect of different malleus treatments on the postoperative efficacy in the tympanosclerosis patients receiving ossicular chain reconstruction.
Fifty-nine patients (62 ears) with tympanosclerosis were treated by ossicular chain reconstruction. All the patients were divided into three groups, including malleus removal group (A, 24 ears), retaining only the malleus handle group (B, 18 ears) and the intact malleus group (C, 20 ears). All the patients were followed up 3 months pre-operation, 3 months and 1 year post-operation by audiometric measurement (the average hearing threshold at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 kHz HI). Tympanic membrane was examined by ear endoscope.
The pre-operation mean air bone gap (ABG) in these groups were 40.07 +/- 77.56 dB, 37.31 +/- 76.45 dB, and 36.75 +/- 76.72 dB, among which the difference had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). At 3 months after operation, the ABG in all cases was improved at 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz. The difference of ABG improvement among these three groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). One year after surgery, the ABG of the three groups were decreased by 17.92 +/- 9.28 dB, 16.76 +/- 5.19 dB and 10.58 +/- 7.38 dB respectively. The hearing improvement in group C is less than the other two groups (P = 0.03, P = 0.016). The difference of hearing improvement between group A and group B had no statistical significance(P > 0.05). Group A and group B each have one case of tympanic membrane perforation and artificial ossicle falling off.
The operating processes of malleus in ossicular chain reconstruction of patients with tympanosclerosis were introduced. In terms of short-term efficacy, the three groups showed no significant difference. However, the long-term efficacy of the patients in the group A and group B were better compared with the group C.
探讨不同锤骨处理方式对鼓室硬化症患者行听骨链重建术后疗效的影响。
59例(62耳)鼓室硬化症患者接受听骨链重建治疗。所有患者分为三组,包括锤骨切除组(A组,24耳)、仅保留锤骨柄组(B组,18耳)和锤骨完整组(C组,20耳)。所有患者在术前3个月、术后3个月及1年进行听力测定随访(0.5、1.0、2.0kHz处的平均听阈,HI)。通过耳内镜检查鼓膜。
这些组术前平均气骨导间距(ABG)分别为40.07±77.56dB、37.31±76.45dB和36.75±76.72dB,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月,所有病例在0.5、1和2kHz处的ABG均有改善。三组间ABG改善情况的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1年,三组的ABG分别下降了17.92±9.28dB、16.76±5.19dB和10.58±7.38dB。C组的听力改善程度低于其他两组(P = 0.03,P = 0.016)。A组和B组之间听力改善的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组各有1例鼓膜穿孔及人工听骨脱落。
介绍了鼓室硬化症患者听骨链重建术中锤骨的手术操作过程。就短期疗效而言,三组无显著差异。然而,与C组相比,A组和B组患者的长期疗效更好。