Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2832-41. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12287. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
There is partial evidence to support the use of phophodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5-I) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).
We compared on-demand dosing of dapoxetine alone and combined with mirodenafil in subjects with lifelong PE and without erectile dysfunction (ED).
Our prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial enrolled 118 subjects with lifelong PE without ED. PE was diagnosed using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Patients were divided into two groups: dapoxetine 30 mg plus placebo (group A, n=56) and dapoxetine 30 mg plus mirodenafil 50 mg (group B, n=62).
During 12 weeks, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and the time from foreplay to beginning intercourse (FTIT) with a stopwatch, and Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) were measured. Overall sexual act time (OSAT; sum of FTIT and IELT) was calculated. Any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also recorded.
Over 12 weeks, IELT, OSAT, and PEP index score significantly improved in group B compared with group A (increased geometric mean IELT in group A and B=3.6 and 6.1 minutes, P=0.026; increased geometric mean OSAT in group A and B=5.5 and 9.9 minutes, P=0.012; increased median PEP index score in group A and B=1.0 and 1.3, P=0.046). However, there was no significant difference between two groups with respect to improvement of FTIT (P=0.147). TEAEs did not differ between groups (all P>0.05), and there was no serious adverse event in any subjects.
Low dose of dapoxetine combined with mirodenafil showed better results in terms of IELT, OSAT, and PEP index score, and similar TEAEs, compared with that of dapoxetine only. Our results support the suggestion that the PDE5-Is have a potential role in the treatment of PE without ED.
有部分证据支持使用磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂(PDE5-I)治疗早泄(PE)。
我们比较了按需给予达泊西汀单独用药和与米罗昔酚联合用药在无勃起功能障碍(ED)的终身性 PE 患者中的疗效。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验,纳入了 118 例无 ED 的终身性 PE 患者。PE 使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版进行诊断。患者被分为两组:达泊西汀 30mg 加安慰剂(A 组,n=56)和达泊西汀 30mg 加米罗昔酚 50mg(B 组,n=62)。
在 12 周内,使用阴道内射精潜伏期时间(IELT)和秒表测量的从性前戏到开始性交的时间(FTIT),以及早泄诊断问卷(PEP)。计算总性活动时间(OSAT;FTIT 和 IELT 的总和)。还记录了任何治疗后出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。
在 12 周内,B 组的 IELT、OSAT 和 PEP 指数评分明显优于 A 组(A 组和 B 组的 IELT 几何均数分别增加了 3.6 和 6.1 分钟,P=0.026;OSAT 几何均数分别增加了 5.5 和 9.9 分钟,P=0.012;PEP 指数评分中位数分别增加了 1.0 和 1.3,P=0.046)。然而,两组在 FTIT 改善方面没有显著差异(P=0.147)。两组之间的 TEAEs 无差异(均 P>0.05),且任何受试者均无严重不良事件。
与单独使用达泊西汀相比,低剂量的达泊西汀联合米罗昔酚在 IELT、OSAT 和 PEP 指数评分方面的疗效更好,且 TEAEs 相似。我们的结果支持 PDE5-Is 可能在治疗无 ED 的 PE 方面发挥作用的观点。