Suppr超能文献

比较 LDX 和常见的长效兴奋剂在治疗青少年和成人 ADHD 时,从推荐的每日一次剂量方案的治疗增强和偏离率。

Comparison of therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen between LDX and commonly prescribed long-acting stimulants for the treatment of ADHD in youth and adults.

机构信息

Shire Development, LLC , Wayne, PA , USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2013 Oct;16(10):1203-15. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.832258. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients initiated on lisdexamfetamine (LDX) vs other once-daily Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved stimulants.

METHODS

ADHD patients initiated on a long-acting ADHD stimulant medication (index medication) in/after 2007 were selected from a large U.S. administrative claims database. Patients were required to be persistent for ≥90 days and continuously enrolled in their healthcare plan for ≥12 months following treatment initiation date. Based on age and previous treatment status, patients were classified into treatment-naïve children and adolescents (6-17 years old), previously treated children and adolescents, treatment-naïve adults (≥18 years old), and previously treated adults. Furthermore, patients were classified into four mutually exclusive treatment groups, based on index medication: lisdexamfetamine (LDX), osmotic release methylphenidate hydrochloride long-acting (OROS MPH), other methylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate long-acting (MPH LA), and amphetamine/dextroamphetamine long-acting (AMPH LA). The average daily consumption was measured as the quantity of index medication supplied in the 12-month study period divided by the total number of days of supply. Therapy augmentation was defined as the use of another ADHD medication concomitantly with the index medication for ≥28 consecutive days. Therapy augmentation and deviation rates from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen were compared between treatment groups using multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Compared to the other treatment groups, LDX patients were less likely to augment with another ADHD medication (range odds ratios [OR]; 1.28-3.30) and to deviate from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen (range OR; 1.73-4.55), except for previously treated adult patients, where therapy augmentation differences were not statistically significant when compared to OROS MPH and MPH LA patients.

LIMITATION

This study did not control for ADHD severity.

CONCLUSION

Overall, compared to LDX-treated patients, patients initiated on other ADHD medications were equally or more likely to have a therapy augmentation and more likely to deviate from the recommended once-daily dosing regimen.

摘要

目的

比较接受拉莫三嗪(LDX)和其他每日一次美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的兴奋剂治疗的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的治疗增强率和偏离推荐每日一次剂量方案的比率。

方法

从美国一个大型行政索赔数据库中选择了 2007 年以后开始接受长效 ADHD 兴奋剂治疗的 ADHD 患者。患者必须持续治疗≥90 天,并在治疗开始日期后至少连续 12 个月参加他们的医疗保健计划。根据年龄和之前的治疗情况,患者分为治疗初治儿童和青少年(6-17 岁)、之前治疗过的儿童和青少年、治疗初治成年人(≥18 岁)和之前治疗过的成年人。此外,根据索引药物将患者分为四个相互排斥的治疗组:拉莫三嗪(LDX)、盐酸哌甲酯渗透控释长效制剂(OROS MPH)、其他哌甲酯/右旋哌甲酯长效制剂(MPH LA)和苯丙胺/右旋苯丙胺长效制剂(AMPH LA)。平均日消耗量是将研究期内提供的索引药物的数量除以供应天数计算得出的。将与索引药物同时使用≥28 天的另一种 ADHD 药物定义为治疗增强。使用多变量逻辑回归模型比较治疗组之间的治疗增强率和偏离推荐每日一次剂量方案的比率。

结果

与其他治疗组相比,LDX 患者不太可能同时使用另一种 ADHD 药物(比值比范围[OR];1.28-3.30)和偏离推荐的每日一次剂量方案(OR 范围;1.73-4.55),除了之前治疗过的成年患者,与 OROS MPH 和 MPH LA 患者相比,治疗增强差异没有统计学意义。

局限性

本研究未控制 ADHD 严重程度。

结论

总的来说,与接受 LDX 治疗的患者相比,接受其他 ADHD 药物治疗的患者同样或更有可能进行治疗增强,并且更有可能偏离推荐的每日一次剂量方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验