Krieger-Redwood Katya, Gaskell M Gareth, Lindsay Shane, Jefferies Elizabeth
University of York.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec;25(12):2179-88. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00463. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Several accounts of speech perception propose that the areas involved in producing language are also involved in perceiving it. In line with this view, neuroimaging studies show activation of premotor cortex (PMC) during phoneme judgment tasks; however, there is debate about whether speech perception necessarily involves motor processes, across all task contexts, or whether the contribution of PMC is restricted to tasks requiring explicit phoneme awareness. Some aspects of speech processing, such as mapping sounds onto meaning, may proceed without the involvement of motor speech areas if PMC specifically contributes to the manipulation and categorical perception of phonemes. We applied TMS to three sites-PMC, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and occipital pole-and for the first time within the TMS literature, directly contrasted two speech perception tasks that required explicit phoneme decisions and mapping of speech sounds onto semantic categories, respectively. TMS to PMC disrupted explicit phonological judgments but not access to meaning for the same speech stimuli. TMS to two further sites confirmed that this pattern was site specific and did not reflect a generic difference in the susceptibility of our experimental tasks to TMS: stimulation of pSTG, a site involved in auditory processing, disrupted performance in both language tasks, whereas stimulation of occipital pole had no effect on performance in either task. These findings demonstrate that, although PMC is important for explicit phonological judgments, crucially, PMC is not necessary for mapping speech onto meanings.
关于言语感知的几种观点认为,参与语言生成的区域也参与语言感知。与此观点一致的是,神经影像学研究表明,在音素判断任务期间,运动前皮质(PMC)会被激活;然而,对于言语感知在所有任务情境中是否必然涉及运动过程,或者PMC的作用是否仅限于需要明确音素意识的任务,存在争议。如果PMC专门负责音素的操作和分类感知,那么言语处理的某些方面,例如将声音映射到意义上,可能在不涉及运动言语区域的情况下进行。我们将经颅磁刺激(TMS)应用于三个部位——PMC、颞上回后部和枕极——并且在TMS文献中首次直接对比了两个言语感知任务,这两个任务分别需要明确的音素决策以及将语音映射到语义类别上。对PMC进行TMS干扰了明确的语音判断,但对于相同的言语刺激,并未干扰对意义的理解。对另外两个部位进行TMS证实了这种模式是部位特异性的,并不反映我们的实验任务对TMS敏感性的一般差异:刺激参与听觉处理的部位pSTG会干扰两项语言任务的表现,而刺激枕极对两项任务的表现均无影响。这些发现表明,尽管PMC对于明确的语音判断很重要,但至关重要的是,PMC对于将言语映射到意义上并非必要。