Suppr超能文献

内科病房和急性老年科病房多病种住院患者的差异特征:PLUPAR 研究。

Differential characteristics in polypathological inpatients in internal medicine departments and acute geriatric units: the PLUPAR study.

机构信息

Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain; Comorbidity and polypathology in Aragón research group, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Dec;24(8):767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Abstract

AIM

To determine whether there are any differences between polypathological patients attended in Internal Medicine departments and acute Geriatric units.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter study was performed. Polypathological patients admitted to an internal medicine or geriatrics department and attended by investigators consecutively between March 1 and June 30, 2011 were included. Data of age, sex, living in a nursing residence or at home, diagnostic category, use of chronic medication, Charlson, Barthel and Lawton-Brody indexes, Pfeiffer questionnaire, delirium during last admission, need of a caregiver, and having a caregiver were gathered. The need of a caregiver was defined when the Barthel index was<60 or Pfeiffer questionnaire ≥ 3 errors.

RESULTS

471 polypathological patients, 337 from internal medicine and 144 from geriatrics units were included. Geriatrics inpatients were older and more frequently female. Cardiac (62.1% vs 49.6%; p=.01), digestive (8.3% vs 3.0%; p=.04) and oncohematological diseases (30.2% vs 18.8%; p=.01) were more frequent in patients of internal medicine units and neurological (66.2% vs 40.2%; p<.001) and locomotive ones (39.1% vs 20.4%; p<.001) in geriatrics inpatients. Charlson index was higher for internal medicine inpatients [4.0(2.1) vs 3.5(2.1); p=.04). Patients attended in geriatrics scored higher in Pfeiffer questionnaire [5.5(3.7) vs 3.8(3.3); p<.001], and lower in Barthel [38.8(32.5) vs 61.2(34.3); p=.001] and Lawton-Brody indexes [0.9(1.6) vs 3.0(2.9); p<.001], and more frequently needed a caregiver (87.8% vs 53.6%; p<.001) and had it.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in disease profile and functional and cognitive situation between polypathological patients of internal medicine and geriatrics departments.

摘要

目的

确定在综合内科和老年科就诊的多病种患者之间是否存在差异。

方法

这是一项横断面多中心研究。纳入 2011 年 3 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间连续收治于综合内科或老年科且由研究者负责诊治的多病种患者。收集患者的年龄、性别、居住于养老院或家中、诊断类别、使用慢性药物、Charlson 评分、Barthel 指数和 Lawton-Brody 指数、Pfeiffer 问卷、上次住院期间有无谵妄、是否需要护理人员以及是否有护理人员等数据。当 Barthel 指数<60 或 Pfeiffer 问卷≥3 个错误时,定义为需要护理人员。

结果

共纳入 471 例多病种患者,其中 337 例来自综合内科,144 例来自老年科。老年科住院患者年龄更大,且女性更为多见。综合内科住院患者中心血管疾病(62.1%比 49.6%;p=.01)、消化系统疾病(8.3%比 3.0%;p=.04)和血液肿瘤疾病(30.2%比 18.8%;p=.01)更为多见,而老年科住院患者神经疾病(66.2%比 40.2%;p<.001)和运动系统疾病(39.1%比 20.4%;p<.001)更为多见。综合内科住院患者 Charlson 指数更高[4.0(2.1)比 3.5(2.1);p=.04]。老年科住院患者 Pfeiffer 问卷评分更高[5.5(3.7)比 3.8(3.3);p<.001],Barthel 指数更低[38.8(32.5)比 61.2(34.3);p=.001]和 Lawton-Brody 指数更低[0.9(1.6)比 3.0(2.9);p<.001],更需要护理人员(87.8%比 53.6%;p<.001),且更有护理人员。

结论

综合内科和老年科的多病种患者在疾病谱、功能和认知状况方面存在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验