Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, ISM UMR 7287, 13288, Marseille cedex 09, France.
Brain Res. 2013 Oct 2;1533:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Electroencephalographic (EEG) studies have well established that motor cortex (M1) activity ~20 Hz decreases during muscular contraction and increases as soon as contraction stops, which are known as event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS), respectively. ERD is supposed to reflect M1 activation, sending information to recruited muscles, while the process underlying ERS is interpreted either as active cortical inhibition or as processing of sensory inputs. Investigation of the process behind ERD/ERS in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) would be particularly relevant since their M1 remains effective despite decreased sensorimotor abilities. In this study, we recorded net joint torque and EEG in 6 participants with cervical SCI and 8 healthy participants who performed isometric elbow flexion at 3 force levels. Multifaceted EEG analysis was introduced to assess ERD/ERS according to their amplitude, frequency range and duration. The results revealed that net joint torque increased with the required force level for all participants and time to contraction inhibition was longer in the SCI group. At the cortical level, ERD/ERS frequency ranges increased with the required force level in all participants, indicating that the modulation of cortical activity with force level is preserved after SCI. However, ERS amplitude decreased only in SCI participants, which may be linked to delayed contraction inhibition. All in all, cortical modulation of frequency range and amplitude could reflect two different kinds of neural communication.
脑电图(EEG)研究已经充分证实,运动皮层(M1)活动在肌肉收缩时约为 20Hz 下降,一旦收缩停止就会增加,这分别被称为事件相关去同步化(ERD)和事件相关同步化(ERS)。ERD 被认为反映了 M1 的激活,向募集的肌肉发送信息,而 ERS 背后的过程被解释为皮质抑制的主动或感觉输入的处理。研究脊髓损伤(SCI)患者 ERD/ERS 背后的过程特别重要,因为尽管他们的感觉运动能力下降,但他们的 M1 仍然有效。在这项研究中,我们记录了 6 名颈 SCI 患者和 8 名健康参与者的净关节扭矩和 EEG,他们以 3 种力水平进行等长肘部弯曲。引入多方面的 EEG 分析,根据其幅度、频率范围和持续时间评估 ERD/ERS。结果表明,所有参与者的净关节扭矩都随所需的力水平增加,SCI 组的收缩抑制时间更长。在皮质水平上,所有参与者的 ERD/ERS 频率范围随所需力水平增加而增加,这表明 SCI 后皮质活动随力水平的调制得以保留。然而,ERS 幅度仅在 SCI 参与者中下降,这可能与收缩抑制延迟有关。总之,频率范围和幅度的皮质调制可能反映了两种不同的神经通讯。