• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者的红细胞输注实践:证据是否改变了实践?

RBC transfusion practices among critically ill patients: has evidence changed practice?

机构信息

1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 2Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD. 4Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 5Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 6Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2344-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e9a49.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e9a49
PMID:23939350
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Increasing evidence, including publication of the Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care trial in 1999, supports a lower hemoglobin threshold for RBC transfusion in ICU patients. However, little is known regarding the influence of this evidence on clinical practice over time in a large population-based cohort.

DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Thirty-five Maryland hospitals.

PATIENTS

Seventy-three thousand three hundred eighty-five nonsurgical adults with an ICU stay greater than 1 day between 1994 and 2007.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The unadjusted odds of patients receiving an RBC transfusion increased from 7.9% during the pre-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care baseline period (1994-1998) to 14.7% during the post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period (1999-2007). A logistic regression model, including 40 relevant patient and hospital characteristics, compared the annual trend in the adjusted odds of RBC transfusion during the pre- versus post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care periods. During the pre-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period, the trend in the adjusted odds of RBC transfusion did not differ between hospitals averaging>200 annual ICU discharges and hospitals averaging≤200 annual ICU discharges (odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13] annually and 1.03 [95% CI, 0.99-1.07] annually, respectively; p=0.401). However, during the post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period, the adjusted odds of RBC transfusion decreased over time in higher ICU volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98] annually) but continued to increase in lower ICU volume hospitals (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08-1.13] annually), p<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort of ICU patients, the unadjusted odds of RBC transfusion increased in both higher and lower ICU volume hospitals both before and after Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care publication. After adjusting for relevant characteristics, the odds continued to increase in lower ICU volume hospitals in the post-Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care period, but it decreased in higher ICU volume hospitals. This suggests that evidence supporting restrictive RBC transfusion thresholds may not be uniformly translated into practice in different hospital settings.

摘要

目的

越来越多的证据表明,包括 1999 年发表的《危重病患者输血需求研究》,支持 ICU 患者的 RBC 输血更低的血红蛋白阈值。然而,在一个大型基于人群的队列中,关于随着时间的推移,这一证据对临床实践的影响,人们知之甚少。

设计

回顾性基于人群的队列研究。

地点

马里兰州的 35 家医院。

患者

1994 年至 2007 年间,73385 名非手术性 ICU 住院时间超过 1 天的成年人。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

未调整的 RBC 输血患者接受输血的几率从输血需求研究的基线期(1994-1998 年)的 7.9%增加到输血需求研究后的时期(1999-2007 年)的 14.7%。一个包括 40 个相关患者和医院特征的逻辑回归模型,比较了输血需求研究前后调整后的 RBC 输血几率的年度趋势。在输血需求研究之前的时期,每年在 ICU 出院人数平均>200 人和 ICU 出院人数平均≤200 人的医院之间,RBC 输血调整后几率的趋势没有差异(比值比,1.07[95%CI,1.01-1.13]和 1.03[95%CI,0.99-1.07];p=0.401)。然而,在输血需求研究之后的时期,RBC 输血的调整后几率在 ICU 容量较高的医院随时间下降(比值比,0.96[95%CI,0.93-0.98]每年),但在 ICU 容量较低的医院继续增加(比值比,1.10[95%CI,1.08-1.13]每年),p<0.001。

结论

在这个 ICU 患者的基于人群的队列中,在输血需求研究发表前后,较高和较低 ICU 容量的医院的 RBC 输血几率均未调整。在调整了相关特征后,在输血需求研究之后的时期,较低 ICU 容量的医院的几率继续增加,但在较高 ICU 容量的医院则下降。这表明,支持限制性 RBC 输血阈值的证据可能并没有在不同的医院环境中得到统一的转化。

相似文献

1
RBC transfusion practices among critically ill patients: has evidence changed practice?危重症患者的红细胞输注实践:证据是否改变了实践?
Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2344-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e9a49.
2
The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill--current clinical practice in the United States.CRIT研究:危重症患者的贫血与输血——美国当前的临床实践
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104112.34142.79.
3
Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients: The Transfusion Requirements in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients Randomized Controlled Trial.重症肿瘤患者的宽松与限制性输血策略:重症肿瘤患者输血需求随机对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):766-773. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002283.
4
Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.重组人促红细胞生成素对危重症患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2827-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2827.
5
Evaluation of RBC Transfusion Practice in Adult ICUs and the Effect of Restrictive Transfusion Protocols on Routine Care.成人重症监护病房红细胞输血实践评估及限制性输血方案对常规护理的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):271-281. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002077.
6
Adherence to a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in critically ill patients: An observational study.危重症患者遵循限制性红细胞输血策略:一项观察性研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jul;68(6):812-820. doi: 10.1111/aas.14402. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Red Blood Cell Product Transfusion Thresholds and Clinical Outcomes.红细胞制品输血阈值与临床结局。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;35(5):494-501. doi: 10.1177/0885066618762746. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
8
Fresh Red Cells for Transfusion in Critically Ill Adults: An Economic Evaluation of the Standard Issue Transfusion Versus Fresher Red-Cell Use in Intensive Care (TRANSFUSE) Clinical Trial.用于危重症成人输血的新鲜红细胞:对标准输注与重症监护中使用更新鲜红细胞(TRANSFUSE 临床试验)的经济学评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;47(7):e572-e579. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003781.
9
Determinants of transfusion decisions in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.混合内科-外科重症监护病房输血决策的决定因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Blood Transfus. 2009 Apr;7(2):106-10. doi: 10.2450/2008.0042-08.
10
Epidemiology of RBC Transfusions in Patients With Severe Acute Kidney Injury: Analysis From the Randomized Evaluation of Normal Versus Augmented Level Study.重症急性肾损伤患者红细胞输血的流行病学:来自正常水平与强化水平随机评估研究的分析
Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):892-900. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001518.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Implementation of Blood Transfusion Recommendations in Pediatric Critical Care Units.影响儿科重症监护病房输血建议实施的因素
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 17;9:800461. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.800461. eCollection 2021.
2
RBC Transfusion Strategies in the ICU: A Concise Review.重症监护病房红细胞输注策略:简要综述。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1637-1644. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003985.
3
Barriers and facilitators to adopting high value practices and de-adopting low value practices in Canadian intensive care units: a multimethod study.
在加拿大重症监护病房采用高价值实践和摒弃低价值实践的障碍和促进因素:一项多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e024159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024159.
4
Effects of a restrictive blood transfusion protocol on acute pediatric burn care: Transfusion threshold in pediatric burns.限制输血方案对儿科烧伤急症处理的影响:儿科烧伤的输血阈值。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Dec;85(6):1048-1054. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002068.
5
Consensus Recommendations for RBC Transfusion Practice in Critically Ill Children From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.儿科危重病输血和贫血专业知识倡议:危重症患儿红细胞输注实践的共识建议。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;19(9):884-898. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001613.
6
New blood for old? High quality evidence that fresh red blood cells confer no benefit for critically ill patients.以新换旧?高质量证据表明,新鲜红细胞对重症患者并无益处。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr;44(4):506-508. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5106-z. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
7
Using Default Options and Other Nudges to Improve Critical Care.使用默认选项及其他助推方法改善重症监护
Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):460-464. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002898.
8
Determinants and time to blood transfusion among thermal burn patients admitted to Mulago Hospital.穆拉戈医院收治的热烧伤患者输血的决定因素及输血时间
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 6;10(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2580-2.
9
Evaluation of RBC Transfusion Practice in Adult ICUs and the Effect of Restrictive Transfusion Protocols on Routine Care.成人重症监护病房红细胞输血实践评估及限制性输血方案对常规护理的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):271-281. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002077.
10
Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.关于理解低价值临床实践的弃用:一项范围综述
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 6;13:255. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0488-z.