Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Jan;61(1):53-67. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24679. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Estimation of the risk of adverse long-term outcomes such as second malignant neoplasms and infertility often requires reproducible quantification of exposures. The method for quantification should be easily utilized and valid across different study populations. The widely used Alkylating Agent Dose (AAD) score is derived from the drug dose distribution of the study population and thus cannot be used for comparisons across populations as each will have a unique distribution of drug doses.
We compared the performance of the Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED), a unit for quantifying alkylating agent exposure independent of study population, to the AAD. Comparisons included associations from three Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) outcome analyses, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and goodness of fit based on the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC).
The CED and AAD performed essentially identically in analyses of risk for pregnancy among the partners of male CCSS participants, risk for adverse dental outcomes among all CCSS participants and risk for premature menopause among female CCSS participants, based on similar associations, lack of statistically significant differences between the areas under the ROC curves and similar model fit values for the AIC between models including the two measures of exposure.
The CED is easily calculated, facilitating its use for patient counseling. It is independent of the drug dose distribution of a particular patient population, a characteristic that will allow direct comparisons of outcomes among epidemiological cohorts. We recommend the use of the CED in future research assessing cumulative alkylating agent exposure.
评估不良长期后果(如第二恶性肿瘤和不孕)的风险通常需要对暴露情况进行可重复的量化。这种量化方法应该易于使用并且在不同的研究人群中都有效。广泛使用的烷化剂剂量(AAD)评分是根据研究人群的药物剂量分布得出的,因此不能用于人群之间的比较,因为每个人群的药物剂量分布都是独特的。
我们比较了环磷酰胺当量剂量(CED)的性能,这是一种独立于研究人群量化烷化剂暴露的单位,与 AAD 进行比较。比较包括来自三个儿童癌症幸存者研究(CCSS)结果分析的关联、接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线以及基于赤池信息量准则(AIC)的拟合优度。
CED 和 AAD 在男性 CCSS 参与者的伴侣妊娠风险、所有 CCSS 参与者的不良牙齿结果风险和女性 CCSS 参与者的过早绝经风险分析中表现基本相同,这基于相似的关联、ROC 曲线下面积之间没有统计学上的显著差异以及 AIC 模型拟合值相似,这表明两种暴露测量方法的模型拟合效果相似。
CED 易于计算,便于为患者提供咨询。它独立于特定患者人群的药物剂量分布,这一特征将允许在流行病学队列之间直接比较结果。我们建议在未来评估累积烷化剂暴露的研究中使用 CED。