Braun Ueli, Trösch Luzia, Nydegger Franz, Hässig Michael
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Aug 13;9:164. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-164.
An automated technique for recording eating and rumination behaviour was evaluated in ten lactating Brown Swiss cows by comparing data obtained from a pressure sensor with data obtained via direct observation over a 24-hour period. The recording device involved a pressure sensor integrated in the noseband of a halter. The analysed variables included number and duration of individual rumination, eating and resting phases, total daily length of these phases and number of cuds chewed per day.
Eating and rumination phases were readily differentiated based on characteristic pressure profiles. Chewing movements during rumination were regular and generated regular waveforms with uniform amplitudes, whereas eating generated irregular waveforms with variable amplitudes. There was complete or almost complete agreement and no significant differences between data obtained via direct observation and pressure sensor technique. Both methods yielded an average of 16 daily eating phases with a mean duration of 28.3 minutes. Total time spent eating was 445.0 minutes for direct observation and 445.4 minutes for the pressure sensor technique. Both techniques recorded an average of 13.3 rumination phases with a mean duration of 30.3 (direct observation) and of 30.2 (pressure sensor) minutes. Total time spent ruminating per day, number of cuds per day and chewing cycles per cud were 389.3 and 388.3 minutes, 410.1 and 410.0 and 60.0 and 60.3 for direct observation and pressure sensor technique, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two methods with respect to mean number of chewing cycles per day (24'669, direct observation vs. 24'751, pressure sensor, P < 0.05, paired t-test). There were strong correlations between the two recording methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.98 to 1.00.
The results confirmed that measurements of eating and rumination variables obtained via the pressure sensor technique are in excellent agreement with data obtained via direct observation.
通过比较压力传感器获取的数据与24小时内直接观察获得的数据,对一种记录采食和反刍行为的自动化技术在10头泌乳期瑞士褐牛中进行了评估。记录装置包括集成在缰绳鼻带中的压力传感器。分析的变量包括个体反刍、采食和休息阶段的次数和持续时间、这些阶段的每日总时长以及每天咀嚼的反刍食团数量。
基于特征压力曲线,采食和反刍阶段很容易区分。反刍期间的咀嚼动作规律,产生具有均匀振幅的规则波形,而采食产生具有可变振幅的不规则波形。通过直接观察和压力传感器技术获得的数据之间完全或几乎完全一致,且无显著差异。两种方法得出的每日平均采食阶段数均为16个,平均持续时间为28.3分钟。直接观察法的总采食时间为445.0分钟,压力传感器技术为445.4分钟。两种技术记录的平均反刍阶段数均为13.3个,平均持续时间分别为30.3分钟(直接观察法)和30.2分钟(压力传感器技术)。直接观察法和压力传感器技术每天的总反刍时间、每天的反刍食团数量和每个反刍食团的咀嚼周期分别为389.3和388.3分钟、410.1和410.0以及60.0和60.3。两种方法在每天的平均咀嚼周期数方面存在显著差异(直接观察法为24669次,压力传感器技术为24751次,P < 0.05,配对t检验)。两种记录方法之间存在强相关性,相关系数范围为0.98至1.00。
结果证实,通过压力传感器技术获得的采食和反刍变量测量值与通过直接观察获得的数据高度一致。