1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital , Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Microb Drug Resist. 2014 Feb;20(1):39-44. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2013.0075. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Ceftriaxone is frequently administered empirically for hospitalized patients with acute pyelonephritis (APN) due to prevalent quinolone resistance in our hospital; however, its use is inappropriate for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, an increasing problem.
A retrospective, 1:2 matched cohort study was performed to evaluate the impact of ESBL on APN treated with empirical ceftriaxone. Each patient in ESBL group was matched with two patients in the non-ESBL group, using a 16-point scoring system, which included age, sex, bacteremia, simplified acute physiology score 2, Charlson comorbidity index and APN severity score.
From 2009 to 2011, among 1,322 community-onset cases of the E. coli bacteriuria with 212 (16%) ESBL producers, 261 patients with APN were treated empirically with ceftriaxone in a secondary care hospital. Among these 261 cases, twenty-six patients in the ESBL group and 52 matched patients in the non-ESBL group (1:2) were included. Mean time to defervescence was 4.6±2.2 days in the ESBL group and 2.6±1.3 days in the non-ESBL group (p<0.01). Rate of microbiological resolution within 5 days after antibiotic treatment was 77% (17/22) in the ESBL group and 100% (45/45) in the non-ESBL group (p=0.01). The duration of hospitalization was 13.3±8.2 days in the ESBL group and 7.3±3.5 days in the non-ESBL group (p<0.01). No patient died in either group.
Empirical ceftriaxone therapy for APN caused by ESBL-producing E. coli is inappropriate, and consequently can delay recovery and result in longer hospitalization.
由于我们医院普遍存在喹诺酮类药物耐药,头孢曲松经常被经验性地用于治疗住院的急性肾盂肾炎(APN)患者;然而,对于产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠杆菌,其使用并不合适,而 ESBL 问题日益严重。
进行了一项回顾性、1:2 匹配队列研究,以评估 ESBL 对经验性头孢曲松治疗的 APN 的影响。ESBL 组中的每位患者均与非 ESBL 组中的两位患者相匹配,使用 16 分评分系统,其中包括年龄、性别、菌血症、简化急性生理学评分 2、Charlson 合并症指数和 APN 严重程度评分。
2009 年至 2011 年,在 1322 例大肠埃希菌菌尿症患者中,有 212 例(16%)为 ESBL 产者,其中 261 例在二级保健医院中经验性地接受了头孢曲松治疗。在这 261 例患者中,ESBL 组有 26 例,非 ESBL 组有 52 例匹配患者(1:2)。ESBL 组退热时间为 4.6±2.2 天,非 ESBL 组为 2.6±1.3 天(p<0.01)。ESBL 组抗生素治疗后 5 天内微生物学缓解率为 77%(17/22),非 ESBL 组为 100%(45/45)(p=0.01)。ESBL 组的住院时间为 13.3±8.2 天,非 ESBL 组为 7.3±3.5 天(p<0.01)。两组均无患者死亡。
对于产 ESBL 的大肠埃希菌引起的 APN,经验性头孢曲松治疗不合适,因此会延迟恢复并导致住院时间延长。