Nieuwstadt Harm A, Geraedts Tom R, Truijman Martine T B, Kooi M Eline, van der Lugt Aad, van der Steen Anton F W, Wentzel Jolanda J, Breeuwer Marcel, Gijsen Frank J H
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jul;72(1):188-201. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24905. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Atherosclerotic carotid plaques can be quantified in vivo by MRI. However, the accuracy in segmentation and quantification of components such as the thin fibrous cap (FC) and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) remains unknown due to the lack of a submillimeter scale ground truth.
A novel approach was taken by numerically simulating in vivo carotid MRI providing a ground truth comparison. Upon evaluation of a simulated clinical protocol, MR readers segmented simulated images of cross-sectional plaque geometries derived from histological data of 12 patients.
MR readers showed high correlation (R) and intraclass correlation (ICC) in measuring the luminal area (R = 0.996, ICC = 0.99), vessel wall area (R = 0.96, ICC = 0.94) and LRNC area (R = 0.95, ICC = 0.94). LRNC area was underestimated (mean error, -24%). Minimum FC thickness showed a mediocre correlation and intraclass correlation (R = 0.71, ICC = 0.69).
Current clinical MRI can quantify carotid plaques but shows limitations for thin FC thickness quantification. These limitations could influence the reliability of carotid MRI for assessing plaque rupture risk associated with FC thickness. Overall, MRI simulations provide a feasible methodology for assessing segmentation and quantification accuracy, as well as for improving scan protocol design.
动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉斑块可通过磁共振成像(MRI)进行体内定量分析。然而,由于缺乏亚毫米级别的真实对照,薄纤维帽(FC)和富含脂质的坏死核心(LRNC)等成分的分割和定量准确性仍不清楚。
采用一种新方法,通过对体内颈动脉MRI进行数值模拟来提供真实对照比较。在评估模拟临床方案后,磁共振成像阅片者对从12例患者的组织学数据得出的横截面斑块几何形状的模拟图像进行分割。
磁共振成像阅片者在测量管腔面积(R = 0.996,组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.99)、血管壁面积(R = 0.96,ICC = 0.94)和LRNC面积(R = 0.95,ICC = 0.94)方面显示出高度相关性(R)和组内相关性(ICC)。LRNC面积被低估(平均误差,-24%)。FC最小厚度显示出中等相关性和组内相关性(R = 0.71,ICC = 0.69)。
当前临床MRI可对颈动脉斑块进行定量分析,但在薄FC厚度定量方面存在局限性。这些局限性可能会影响颈动脉MRI评估与FC厚度相关的斑块破裂风险的可靠性。总体而言,MRI模拟为评估分割和定量准确性以及改进扫描方案设计提供了一种可行的方法。