Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario; Director, Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 May;58(5 Suppl 1):5S-13S. doi: 10.1177/088740341305805s02.
To review the evidence for the role of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics (APs), especially the second-generation AP (SGA) LAIs, in the treatment of schizophrenia and to discuss the use rates of LAIs in Canada.
A search of online medical databases was conducted of the published literature (1995-2012) of the effects of LAIs on the domains of remission, adherence, relapse, and hospitalization. Results obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large-scale observational studies were included. Expert consensus data were also solicited on LAI use within a Canadian context.
While the efficacy of LAIs, compared with placebo, is well established, the evidence from RCTs is equivocal for any specific advantage for SGA LAIs, compared with oral medications, probably owing to challenges in conducting such RCTs. Evidence from methodologically less rigorous studies and from clinical practice suggests some advantages in achieving and maintaining remission, risk of relapse, and hospitalization. The rate of LAI (first-generation AP and SGA) use from published outpatient studies is low at 6.3% in Canada, compared with 15% to 80% worldwide. However, there is a relatively high rate of use in specific early psychosis programs and in conjunction with community treatment orders in Canada.
LAIs are at least as effective as oral APs in the treatment of psychotic disorders. The former may have specific advantages for patients who demonstrate covert nonadherence. The underuse of LAIs in Canada needs to be better understood and addressed.
回顾长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药(APs),尤其是第二代 AP(SGA)LAIs,在精神分裂症治疗中的作用的证据,并讨论加拿大 LAI 的使用情况。
对已发表的文献(1995-2012 年)进行在线医学数据库检索,这些文献研究了 LAI 在缓解、依从性、复发和住院等领域的效果。包括随机对照试验(RCTs)、系统评价、荟萃分析和大型观察性研究的结果。还征求了加拿大背景下 LAI 使用的专家共识数据。
虽然 LAI 与安慰剂相比的疗效已经得到证实,但 RCT 证据对于 SGA LAI 与口服药物相比的任何具体优势都是不确定的,这可能是由于进行此类 RCT 存在挑战。方法学上不太严格的研究和临床实践的证据表明,在实现和维持缓解、复发风险和住院方面存在一些优势。从已发表的门诊研究来看,加拿大 LAI(第一代 AP 和 SGA)的使用率较低,为 6.3%,而全球的使用率为 15%至 80%。然而,在加拿大,特定的早期精神病计划以及与社区治疗令结合使用时,LAI 的使用率相对较高。
LAIs 在治疗精神障碍方面至少与口服 AP 一样有效。对于表现出隐性不依从的患者,前者可能具有特定的优势。加拿大 LAI 的使用率较低,需要更好地理解和解决。