Besser Jana, Koelewijn Thomas, Zekveld Adriana A, Kramer Sophia E, Festen Joost M
1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):75-93. doi: 10.1177/1084713813495459. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
The ability to recognize masked speech, commonly measured with a speech reception threshold (SRT) test, is associated with cognitive processing abilities. Two cognitive factors frequently assessed in speech recognition research are the capacity of working memory (WM), measured by means of a reading span (Rspan) or listening span (Lspan) test, and the ability to read masked text (linguistic closure), measured by the text reception threshold (TRT). The current article provides a review of recent hearing research that examined the relationship of TRT and WM span to SRTs in various maskers. Furthermore, modality differences in WM capacity assessed with the Rspan compared to the Lspan test were examined and related to speech recognition abilities in an experimental study with young adults with normal hearing (NH). Span scores were strongly associated with each other, but were higher in the auditory modality. The results of the reviewed studies suggest that TRT and WM span are related to each other, but differ in their relationships with SRT performance. In NH adults of middle age or older, both TRT and Rspan were associated with SRTs in speech maskers, whereas TRT better predicted speech recognition in fluctuating nonspeech maskers. The associations with SRTs in steady-state noise were inconclusive for both measures. WM span was positively related to benefit from contextual information in speech recognition, but better TRTs related to less interference from unrelated cues. Data for individuals with impaired hearing are limited, but larger WM span seems to give a general advantage in various listening situations.
识别掩蔽语音的能力通常通过言语接受阈(SRT)测试来衡量,它与认知加工能力相关。在言语识别研究中经常评估的两个认知因素是工作记忆(WM)容量,通过阅读广度(Rspan)或听力广度(Lspan)测试来衡量,以及阅读掩蔽文本的能力(语言闭合),通过文本接受阈(TRT)来衡量。本文综述了近期听力研究,这些研究考察了TRT和WM广度与各种掩蔽器中SRT的关系。此外,在一项针对听力正常(NH)的年轻人的实验研究中,研究了用Rspan与Lspan测试评估的WM容量的模态差异,并将其与言语识别能力相关联。广度得分彼此密切相关,但在听觉模态中得分更高。综述研究的结果表明,TRT和WM广度相互关联,但它们与SRT表现的关系有所不同。在中年或老年的NH成年人中,TRT和Rspan都与言语掩蔽器中的SRT相关,而TRT能更好地预测波动非言语掩蔽器中的言语识别。对于这两种测量方法,与稳态噪声中SRT的关联尚无定论。WM广度与言语识别中上下文信息带来的益处呈正相关,但更好的TRT与无关线索的干扰较少相关。听力受损个体的数据有限,但更大的WM广度似乎在各种听力情况下都具有普遍优势。