Johnson E C, Hudson T L, Greene E R
Biomedical Research Division, Lovelace Medical Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Jul;69(1):104-11. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.1.104.
The directional response of human left ventricular stroke volume during exercise recovery is unclear. Stroke volume has been reported to increase and decrease over exercise values during early recovery. The confounding variable may be posture. With the use of pulsed Doppler ultrasound, we tested the hypothesis that there is a significant difference between seated and supine stroke index (SI) during passive recovery from seated ergometer exercise. Thirteen subjects aged 26 +/- 2 yr performed two seated cycle ergometer exercise tests to 70% of predicted maximum heart rate (HR). Recovery was supine on one test and seated on the other. Cardiac index (CI), HR, and SI were calculated during rest, exercise, and 10 min of recovery. At rest, SI and CI were significantly (P less than 0.01) less and HR significantly (P less than 0.01) greater when the subjects were seated than when they were supine. At the last exercise work load, no significant differences were found in any measured variable between tests. During recovery, supine SI was maximal 180 s postexercise (99 +/- 14 ml/m2) and exceeded (P less than 0.01) resting supine (81 +/- 14 ml/m2) and peak exercise (77 +/- 14 ml/m2) SI by 22 and 29%, respectively. Seated SI was constant at peak exercise levels for 2 min. Seated and supine recovery CI never exceeded exercise values. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure recovery curves were similar in the two postures. We conclude that posture significantly affects SI during recovery from submaximal seated exercise. These results have implications for choice of recovery posture after stress testing in cardiac patients where it is desirable to minimize ventricular loading.
运动恢复期间人类左心室每搏输出量的方向反应尚不清楚。据报道,在早期恢复过程中,每搏输出量相对于运动时的值会增加或减少。混杂变量可能是姿势。我们使用脉冲多普勒超声,检验了以下假设:在从坐位测力计运动进行被动恢复期间,坐位和仰卧位的每搏指数(SI)存在显著差异。13名年龄为26±2岁的受试者进行了两次坐位周期测力计运动测试,达到预测最大心率(HR)的70%。一次测试的恢复姿势为仰卧位,另一次为坐位。在休息、运动及恢复10分钟期间计算心脏指数(CI)、HR和SI。休息时,受试者坐位时的SI和CI显著低于仰卧位(P<0.01),而HR显著高于仰卧位(P<0.01)。在最后一次运动负荷时,两次测试的任何测量变量均未发现显著差异。恢复期间,仰卧位SI在运动后180秒时达到最大值(99±14ml/m²),分别比仰卧位静息值(81±14ml/m²)和运动峰值(77±14ml/m²)SI高出22%和29%(P<0.01)。坐位SI在运动峰值水平保持2分钟不变。坐位和仰卧位恢复时的CI从未超过运动时的值。两种姿势下收缩压和舒张压的恢复曲线相似。我们得出结论,姿势在次最大强度坐位运动恢复期间对SI有显著影响。这些结果对于心脏病患者压力测试后恢复姿势的选择具有重要意义,在这种情况下,希望将心室负荷降至最低。